help button home button Genetics Plant Phys
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on June 18, 2005.

Genetics, Vol. 171, 1455-1461, December 2005, Copyright © 2005
doi:10.1534/genetics.105.044057

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
genetics.105.044057v1
171/4/1455    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Hoof, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Hoof, A.

Conserved Functions of Yeast Genes Support the Duplication, Degeneration and Complementation Model for Gene Duplication

Ambro van Hoof1

University of Texas Health Science Center, Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Houston, Texas 77030

1 Address for correspondence: University of Texas Health Science Center, Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, 6431 Fannin MSB1.212, Houston, TX 77030.
E-mail: ambro.van.hoof{at}uth.tmc.edu

Gene duplication is often cited as a potential mechanism for the evolution of new traits, but this hypothesis has not been thoroughly tested experimentally. A classical model of gene duplication states that after gene duplication one copy of the gene preserves the ancestral function, while the other copy is free to evolve a new function. In an alternative duplication, divergence, and complementation model, duplicated genes are preserved because each copy of the gene loses some, but not all, of its functions through degenerating mutations. This results in the degenerating mutations in one gene being complemented by the other and vice versa. These two models make very different predictions about the function of the preduplication orthologs in closely related species. These predictions have been tested here for several duplicated yeast genes that appeared to be the leading candidates to fit the classical model. Surprisingly, the results show that duplicated genes are maintained because each copy carries out a subset of the conserved functions that were already present in the preduplication gene. Therefore, the results are not consistent with the classical model, but instead fit the duplication, divergence, and complementation model.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Genome Res.Home page
D. R. Scannell and K. H. Wolfe
A burst of protein sequence evolution and a prolonged period of asymmetric evolution follow gene duplication in yeast
Genome Res., January 1, 2008; 18(1): 137 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genes Dev.Home page
O. Isken and L. E. Maquat
Quality control of eukaryotic mRNA: safeguarding cells from abnormal mRNA function
Genes & Dev., August 1, 2007; 21(15): 1833 - 3856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eukaryot CellHome page
J. K. Hicks and J. Heitman
Divergence of Protein Kinase A Catalytic Subunits in Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii Illustrates Evolutionary Reconfiguration of a Signaling Cascade
Eukaryot. Cell, March 1, 2007; 6(3): 413 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
K. P. Byrne and K. H. Wolfe
Consistent Patterns of Rate Asymmetry and Gene Loss Indicate Widespread Neofunctionalization of Yeast Genes After Whole-Genome Duplication
Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 1341 - 1350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Hum ReprodHome page
S. Premi, J. Srivastava, S. P. Chandy, J. Ahmad, and S. Ali
Tandem duplication and copy number polymorphism of the SRY gene in patients with sex chromosome anomalies and males exposed to natural background radiation
Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 12(2): 113 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Genetics Society of America.