Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on July 14, 2005.

Genetics, Vol. 171, 1267-1275, November 2005, Copyright © 2005
doi:10.1534/genetics.105.041509

Genetic Analysis of Variation in Gene Expression in Arabidopsis thaliana

* Department of Plant Systems Biology, Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology (VIB), Ghent University, B-9052 Gent, Belgium, {dagger} Laboratory of Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre, NL-6700 AJ Wageningen, The Netherlands and {ddagger} Microarray Facility, Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology (VIB), B-3000 Leuven, Belgium

1 Corresponding author: Department of Plant Systems Biology, VIB2-Universiteit Gent, Technologiepark 927, B-9052 Gent, Belgium.
E-mail: marnik.vuylsteke{at}psb.ugent.be

In Arabidopsis thaliana, significant efforts to determine the extent of genomic variation between phenotypically divergent accessions are under way, but virtually nothing is known about variation at the transcription level. We used microarrays to examine variation in transcript abundance among three inbred lines and two pairs of reciprocal F1 hybrids of the highly self-fertilizing species Arabidopsis. Composite additive genetic effects for gene expression were estimated from pairwise comparisons of the three accessions Columbia (Col), Landsberg erecta (Ler), and Cape Verde Islands (Cvi). For the pair Col and Ler, 27.0% of the 4876 genes exhibited additive genetic effects in their expression ({alpha} = 0.001) vs. 32.2 and 37.5% for Cvi with Ler and Col, respectively. Significant differential expression ranged from 32.45 down to 1.10 in fold change and typically differed by a factor of 1.56. Maternal or paternal transmission affected only a few genes, suggesting that the reciprocal effects observed in the two crosses analyzed were minimal. Dominance effects were estimated from the comparisons of hybrids with the corresponding midparent value. The percentage of genes showing dominance at the expression level in the F1 hybrids ranged from 6.4 to 21.1% ({alpha} = 0.001). Breakdown of these numbers of genes according to the magnitude of the dominance ratio revealed heterosis for expression for on average 9% of the genes. Further advances in the genetic analysis of gene expression variation may contribute to a better understanding of its role in affecting quantitative trait variation at the phenotypic level.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. A. Swanson-Wagner, R. DeCook, Y. Jia, T. Bancroft, T. Ji, X. Zhao, D. Nettleton, and P. S. Schnable
Paternal Dominance of Trans-eQTL Influences Gene Expression Patterns in Maize Hybrids
Science, November 20, 2009; 326(5956): 1118 - 1120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. M. Graze, L. M. McIntyre, B. J. Main, M. L. Wayne, and S. V. Nuzhdin
Regulatory Divergence in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans, a Genomewide Analysis of Allele-Specific Expression
Genetics, October 1, 2009; 183(2): 547 - 561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
C. Alonso-Blanco, M. G.M. Aarts, L. Bentsink, J. J.B. Keurentjes, M. Reymond, D. Vreugdenhil, and M. Koornneef
What Has Natural Variation Taught Us about Plant Development, Physiology, and Adaptation?
PLANT CELL, July 1, 2009; 21(7): 1877 - 1896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Wei, Y. Tao, G. Liu, C. Chen, R. Luo, H. Xia, Q. Gan, H. Zeng, Z. Lu, Y. Han, et al.
Inaugural Article: A transcriptomic analysis of superhybrid rice LYP9 and its parents
PNAS, May 12, 2009; 106(19): 7695 - 7701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
R. Albouyeh and K. Ritland
Estimating Heritability of Gene Expression Using Parent-Offspring Regression with 2-Channel Microarrays
J. Hered., January 1, 2009; 100(1): 114 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol PlantHome page
H.-Y. Zhang, H. He, L.-B. Chen, L. Li, M.-Z. Liang, X.-F. Wang, X.-G. Liu, G.-M. He, R.-S. Chen, L.-G. Ma, et al.
A Genome-Wide Transcription Analysis Reveals a Close Correlation of Promoter INDEL Polymorphism and Heterotic Gene Expression in Rice Hybrids
Mol Plant, September 1, 2008; 1(5): 720 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
N. Hoecker, B. Keller, N. Muthreich, D. Chollet, P. Descombes, H.-P. Piepho, and F. Hochholdinger
Comparison of Maize (Zea mays L.) F1-Hybrid and Parental Inbred Line Primary Root Transcriptomes Suggests Organ-Specific Patterns of Nonadditive Gene Expression and Conserved Expression Trends
Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1275 - 1283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
Y. Zhuang and K. L. Adams
Extensive Allelic Variation in Gene Expression in Populus F1 Hybrids
Genetics, December 1, 2007; 177(4): 1987 - 1996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. Rottscheidt and B. Harr
Extensive Additivity of Gene Expression Differentiates Subspecies of the House Mouse
Genetics, November 1, 2007; 177(3): 1553 - 1567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
B. Asselbergh, K. Curvers, S. C. Franca, K. Audenaert, M. Vuylsteke, F. Van Breusegem, and M. Hofte
Resistance to Botrytis cinerea in sitiens, an Abscisic Acid-Deficient Tomato Mutant, Involves Timely Production of Hydrogen Peroxide and Cell Wall Modifications in the Epidermis
Plant Physiology, August 1, 2007; 144(4): 1863 - 1877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
K. L. Adams
Evolution of Duplicate Gene Expression in Polyploid and Hybrid Plants
J. Hered., March 1, 2007; 98(2): 136 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
N. M. Springer and R. M. Stupar
Allelic variation and heterosis in maize: How do two halves make more than a whole?
Genome Res., March 1, 2007; 17(3): 264 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
X. Cui, J. Affourtit, K. R. Shockley, Y. Woo, and G. A. Churchill
Inheritance Patterns of Transcript Levels in F1 Hybrid Mice
Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 627 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
D. Nettleton
A discussion of statistical methods for design and analysis of microarray experiments for plant scientists.
PLANT CELL, September 1, 2006; 18(9): 2112 - 2121.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
R. Kiekens, A. Vercauteren, B. Moerkerke, E. Goetghebeur, H. Van Den Daele, R. Sterken, M. Kuiper, F. van Eeuwijk, and M. Vuylsteke
Genome-wide screening for cis-regulatory variation using a classical diallel crossing scheme
Nucleic Acids Res., August 2, 2006; 34(13): 3677 - 3686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. M. Stupar and N. M. Springer
Cis-transcriptional Variation in Maize Inbred Lines B73 and Mo17 Leads to Additive Expression Patterns in the F1 Hybrid
Genetics, August 1, 2006; 173(4): 2199 - 2210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]