- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Data Supplement
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.105.041509v1
171/3/1267 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Vuylsteke, M.
- Articles by Zabeau, M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Vuylsteke, M.
- Articles by Zabeau, M.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on July 14, 2005.
Genetics, Vol. 171, 1267-1275, November 2005, Copyright © 2005
doi:10.1534/genetics.105.041509
Genetic Analysis of Variation in Gene Expression in Arabidopsis thaliana
Marnik Vuylsteke*,1,
Fred van Eeuwijk
,
Paul Van Hummelen
,
Martin Kuiper* and
Marc Zabeau*
* Department of Plant Systems Biology, Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology (VIB), Ghent University, B-9052 Gent, Belgium,
Laboratory of Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre, NL-6700 AJ Wageningen, The Netherlands and
Microarray Facility, Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology (VIB), B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
1 Corresponding author: Department of Plant Systems Biology, VIB2-Universiteit Gent, Technologiepark 927, B-9052 Gent, Belgium.
E-mail: marnik.vuylsteke{at}psb.ugent.be
In Arabidopsis thaliana, significant efforts to determine the extent of genomic variation between phenotypically divergent accessions are under way, but virtually nothing is known about variation at the transcription level. We used microarrays to examine variation in transcript abundance among three inbred lines and two pairs of reciprocal F1 hybrids of the highly self-fertilizing species Arabidopsis. Composite additive genetic effects for gene expression were estimated from pairwise comparisons of the three accessions Columbia (Col), Landsberg erecta (Ler), and Cape Verde Islands (Cvi). For the pair Col and Ler, 27.0% of the 4876 genes exhibited additive genetic effects in their expression (
= 0.001) vs. 32.2 and 37.5% for Cvi with Ler and Col, respectively. Significant differential expression ranged from 32.45 down to 1.10 in fold change and typically differed by a factor of 1.56. Maternal or paternal transmission affected only a few genes, suggesting that the reciprocal effects observed in the two crosses analyzed were minimal. Dominance effects were estimated from the comparisons of hybrids with the corresponding midparent value. The percentage of genes showing dominance at the expression level in the F1 hybrids ranged from 6.4 to 21.1% (
= 0.001). Breakdown of these numbers of genes according to the magnitude of the dominance ratio revealed heterosis for expression for on average 9% of the genes. Further advances in the genetic analysis of gene expression variation may contribute to a better understanding of its role in affecting quantitative trait variation at the phenotypic level.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. A. Swanson-Wagner, R. DeCook, Y. Jia, T. Bancroft, T. Ji, X. Zhao, D. Nettleton, and P. S. Schnable Paternal Dominance of Trans-eQTL Influences Gene Expression Patterns in Maize Hybrids Science, November 20, 2009; 326(5956): 1118 - 1120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Graze, L. M. McIntyre, B. J. Main, M. L. Wayne, and S. V. Nuzhdin Regulatory Divergence in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans, a Genomewide Analysis of Allele-Specific Expression Genetics, October 1, 2009; 183(2): 547 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Alonso-Blanco, M. G.M. Aarts, L. Bentsink, J. J.B. Keurentjes, M. Reymond, D. Vreugdenhil, and M. Koornneef What Has Natural Variation Taught Us about Plant Development, Physiology, and Adaptation? PLANT CELL, July 1, 2009; 21(7): 1877 - 1896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Wei, Y. Tao, G. Liu, C. Chen, R. Luo, H. Xia, Q. Gan, H. Zeng, Z. Lu, Y. Han, et al. Inaugural Article: A transcriptomic analysis of superhybrid rice LYP9 and its parents PNAS, May 12, 2009; 106(19): 7695 - 7701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Albouyeh and K. Ritland Estimating Heritability of Gene Expression Using Parent-Offspring Regression with 2-Channel Microarrays J. Hered., January 1, 2009; 100(1): 114 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-Y. Zhang, H. He, L.-B. Chen, L. Li, M.-Z. Liang, X.-F. Wang, X.-G. Liu, G.-M. He, R.-S. Chen, L.-G. Ma, et al. A Genome-Wide Transcription Analysis Reveals a Close Correlation of Promoter INDEL Polymorphism and Heterotic Gene Expression in Rice Hybrids Mol Plant, September 1, 2008; 1(5): 720 - 731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hoecker, B. Keller, N. Muthreich, D. Chollet, P. Descombes, H.-P. Piepho, and F. Hochholdinger Comparison of Maize (Zea mays L.) F1-Hybrid and Parental Inbred Line Primary Root Transcriptomes Suggests Organ-Specific Patterns of Nonadditive Gene Expression and Conserved Expression Trends Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1275 - 1283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhuang and K. L. Adams Extensive Allelic Variation in Gene Expression in Populus F1 Hybrids Genetics, December 1, 2007; 177(4): 1987 - 1996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Rottscheidt and B. Harr Extensive Additivity of Gene Expression Differentiates Subspecies of the House Mouse Genetics, November 1, 2007; 177(3): 1553 - 1567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Asselbergh, K. Curvers, S. C. Franca, K. Audenaert, M. Vuylsteke, F. Van Breusegem, and M. Hofte Resistance to Botrytis cinerea in sitiens, an Abscisic Acid-Deficient Tomato Mutant, Involves Timely Production of Hydrogen Peroxide and Cell Wall Modifications in the Epidermis Plant Physiology, August 1, 2007; 144(4): 1863 - 1877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Adams Evolution of Duplicate Gene Expression in Polyploid and Hybrid Plants J. Hered., March 1, 2007; 98(2): 136 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Springer and R. M. Stupar Allelic variation and heterosis in maize: How do two halves make more than a whole? Genome Res., March 1, 2007; 17(3): 264 - 275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Cui, J. Affourtit, K. R. Shockley, Y. Woo, and G. A. Churchill Inheritance Patterns of Transcript Levels in F1 Hybrid Mice Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 627 - 637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Nettleton A discussion of statistical methods for design and analysis of microarray experiments for plant scientists. PLANT CELL, September 1, 2006; 18(9): 2112 - 2121. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kiekens, A. Vercauteren, B. Moerkerke, E. Goetghebeur, H. Van Den Daele, R. Sterken, M. Kuiper, F. van Eeuwijk, and M. Vuylsteke Genome-wide screening for cis-regulatory variation using a classical diallel crossing scheme Nucleic Acids Res., August 2, 2006; 34(13): 3677 - 3686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Stupar and N. M. Springer Cis-transcriptional Variation in Maize Inbred Lines B73 and Mo17 Leads to Additive Expression Patterns in the F1 Hybrid Genetics, August 1, 2006; 173(4): 2199 - 2210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||








