Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on June 18, 2005.

Genetics, Vol. 171, 145-155, September 2005, Copyright © 2005
doi:10.1534/genetics.105.043497

X-Linked Genes Evolve Higher Codon Bias in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis

Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305

1 Corresponding author: 371 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305.
E-mail: ndsingh{at}stanford.edu

Comparing patterns of molecular evolution between autosomes and sex chromosomes (such as X and W chromosomes) can provide insight into the forces underlying genome evolution. Here we investigate patterns of codon bias evolution on the X chromosome and autosomes in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis. We demonstrate that X-linked genes have significantly higher codon bias compared to autosomal genes in both Drosophila and Caenorhabditis. Furthermore, genes that become X-linked evolve higher codon bias gradually, over tens of millions of years. We provide several lines of evidence that this elevation in codon bias is due exclusively to their chromosomal location and not to any other property of X-linked genes. We present two possible explanations for these observations. One possibility is that natural selection is more efficient on the X chromosome due to effective haploidy of the X chromosomes in males and persistently low effective numbers of reproducing males compared to that of females. Alternatively, X-linked genes might experience stronger natural selection for higher codon bias as a result of maladaptive reduction of their dosage engendered by the loss of the Y-linked homologs.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. D. Singh, P. F. Arndt, A. G. Clark, and C. F. Aquadro
Strong Evidence for Lineage and Sequence Specificity of Substitution Rates and Patterns in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2009; 26(7): 1591 - 1605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. D. Cutter, A. Dey, and R. L. Murray
Evolution of the Caenorhabditis elegans Genome
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2009; 26(6): 1199 - 1234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. Vicoso and B. Charlesworth
Recombination Rates May Affect the Ratio of X to Autosomal Noncoding Polymorphism in African Populations of Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, April 1, 2009; 181(4): 1699 - 1701.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
S. Hutter and W. Stephan
Reply to Beatriz Vicoso and Brian Charlesworth
Genetics, April 1, 2009; 181(4): 1703 - 1703.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. D. Singh, A. M. Larracuente, and A. G. Clark
Contrasting the Efficacy of Selection on the X and Autosomes in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 454 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. M. Macpherson, G. Sella, J. C. Davis, and D. A. Petrov
Genomewide Spatial Correspondence Between Nonsynonymous Divergence and Neutral Polymorphism Reveals Extensive Adaptation in Drosophila
Genetics, December 1, 2007; 177(4): 2083 - 2099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. D. Singh, V. L. Bauer DuMont, M. J. Hubisz, R. Nielsen, and C. F. Aquadro
Patterns of Mutation and Selection at Synonymous Sites in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2007; 24(12): 2687 - 2697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
T. Connallon
Adaptive Protein Evolution of X-linked and Autosomal Genes in Drosophila: Implications for Faster-X Hypotheses
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2007; 24(11): 2566 - 2572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. Akashi, W.-Y. Ko, S. Piao, A. John, P. Goel, C.-F. Lin, and A. P. Vitins
Molecular Evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Subgroup: Frequent Parameter Fluctuations on the Timescale of Molecular Divergence
Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1711 - 1726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]