Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on March 2, 2005.

Genetics, Vol. 170, 95-106, May 2005, Copyright © 2005
doi:10.1534/genetics.104.036301

Differential Activation of M26-Containing Meiotic Recombination Hot Spots in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

* North West Cancer Research Fund Institute, University of Wales Bangor, Bangor LL57 2UW, United Kingdom
{dagger} Department of Chromosome Biology, University of Vienna, A-1030 Vienna, Austria

2 Corresponding author: North West Cancer Research Fund Institute, Memorial Bldg., University of Wales Bangor, Deiniol Rd., Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, United Kingdom.
E-mail: ramsay{at}sbs.bangor.ac.uk

Certain genomic loci, termed hot spots, are predisposed to undergo genetic recombination during meiosis at higher levels relative to the rest of the genome. The factors that specify hot-spot potential are not well understood. The M26 hot spot of Schizosaccharomyces pombe is dependent on certain trans activators and a specific nucleotide sequence, which can function as a hot spot in a position- and orientation-independent fashion within ade6. In this report we demonstrate that a linear element (LE) component, Rec10, has a function that is required for activation of some, but not all, M26-containing hot spots and from this we propose that, with respect to hot-spot activity, there are three classes of M26-containing sequences. We demonstrate that the localized sequence context in which the M26 heptamer is embedded is a major factor governing whether or not this Rec10 function is required for full hot-spot activation. Furthermore, we show that the rec10-144 mutant, which is defective in full activation of ade6-M26, but proficient for activation of other M26-containing hot spots, is also defective in the formation of LEs, suggesting an intimate link between higher-order chromatin structure and local influences on hot-spot activation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. W. Pryce, S. Ramayah, A. Jaendling, and R. J. McFarlane
Recombination at DNA replication fork barriers is not universal and is differentially regulated by Swi1
PNAS, March 24, 2009; 106(12): 4770 - 4775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
E. Doll, M. Molnar, G. Cuanoud, G. Octobre, V. Latypov, K. Ludin, and J. Kohli
Cohesin and Recombination Proteins Influence the G1-to-S Transition in Azygotic Meiosis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Genetics, October 1, 2008; 180(2): 727 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. L. Wells, D. W. Pryce, A. Estreicher, J. Loidl, and R. J. McFarlane
Linear Element-Independent Meiotic Recombination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Genetics, November 1, 2006; 174(3): 1105 - 1114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. D. Yandeau-Nelson, B. J. Nikolau, and P. S. Schnable
Effects of trans-acting Genetic Modifiers on Meiotic Recombination Across the a1-sh2 Interval of Maize
Genetics, September 1, 2006; 174(1): 101 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
E. A. Espeso, L. Cobeno, and H. N. Arst Jr.
Discrepancies Between Recombination Frequencies and Physical Distances in Aspergillus nidulans: Implications for Gene Identification
Genetics, October 1, 2005; 171(2): 835 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]