help button home button Genetics AJP: Heart and Circ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on March 21, 2005.

Genetics, Vol. 170, 195-205, May 2005, Copyright © 2005
doi:10.1534/genetics.104.038703

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
genetics.104.038703v1
170/1/195    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Eickbush, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Eickbush, T. H.

Characterization of Active R2 Retrotransposition in the rDNA Locus of Drosophila simulans

Xian Zhang and Thomas H. Eickbush1

Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627

1 Corresponding author: Department of Biology, Hutchinson Hall, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627-0211.
E-mail: eick{at}mail.rochester.edu

The rRNA gene (rDNA) loci of all arthropod lineages contain non-LTR retrotransposable elements that have evolved to specifically insert into the 28S rRNA genes. Extensive in vitro experiments have been conducted to investigate the mechanism of R2 retrotransposition but little is known of the insertion frequency or cellular factors that might regulate R2 activity. In this article, isofemale lines obtained from a population of Drosophila simulans were surveyed for recent R2 insertions. Within most lines, all individuals showed the same collection of R2 insertions, providing no evidence for recent R2 activity. However, in a few of the isofemale lines, virtually all individuals differed in their R2 insertion profiles. The descendants of individual pairs of flies from these "active lines" rapidly accumulated new insertions. The frequent insertion of new R2 elements was associated with the elimination of old R2 elements from the rDNA locus. The existence of lines in which R2 retrotransposes frequently and lines in which the elements appear dormant suggests that cellular mechanisms that can regulate the activity of R2 exist. Retrotransposition activity was correlated with the number of full-length R2 elements but not with the size of the rDNA locus or the number of uninserted units.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
X. Zhang, J. Zhou, and T. H. Eickbush
Rapid R2 Retrotransposition Leads to the Loss of Previously Inserted Copies via Large Deletions of the rDNA Locus
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2008; 25(1): 229 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome Res.Home page
D. E. Stage and T. H. Eickbush
Sequence variation within the rRNA gene loci of 12 Drosophila species
Genome Res., December 1, 2007; 17(12): 1888 - 1897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. Ye and T. H. Eickbush
Chromatin Structure and Transcription of the R1- and R2-Inserted rRNA Genes of Drosophila melanogaster
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2006; 26(23): 8781 - 8790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Genetics Society of America.