- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.104.032748v1
169/3/1573 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Munté, A.
- Articles by Segarra, C.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Munté, A.
- Articles by Segarra, C.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on January 31, 2005.
Genetics, Vol. 169, 1573-1581, March 2005, Copyright © 2005
doi:10.1534/genetics.104.032748
Chromosomal Inversion Polymorphism Leads to Extensive Genetic Structure
A Multilocus Survey in Drosophila subobscura
Agustí Munté1, Julio Rozas, Montserrat Aguadé and Carmen Segarra2
Departament de Genètica, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
2 Corresponding author: Departament de Genètica, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
E-mail: csegarra{at}ub.edu
The adaptive character of inversion polymorphism in Drosophila subobscura is well established. The OST and O3+4 chromosomal arrangements of this species differ by two overlapping inversions that arose independently on O3 chromosomes. Nucleotide variation in eight gene regions distributed along inversion O3 was analyzed in 14 OST and 14 O3+4 lines. Levels of variation within arrangements were quite similar along the inversion. In addition, we detected (i) extensive genetic differentiation between arrangements in all regions, regardless of their distance to the inversion breakpoints; (ii) strong association between nucleotide variants and chromosomal arrangements; and (iii) high levels of linkage disequilibrium in intralocus and also in interlocus comparisons, extending over distances as great as
4 Mb. These results are not consistent with the higher genetic exchange between chromosomal arrangements expected in the central part of an inversion from double-crossover events. Hence, double crossovers were not produced or, alternatively, recombinant chromosomes were eliminated by natural selection to maintain coadapted gene complexes. If the strong genetic differentiation detected along O3 extends to other inversions, nucleotide variation would be highly structured not only in D. subobscura, but also in the genome of other species with a rich chromosomal polymorphism.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Santos Recombination Load in a Chromosomal Inversion Polymorphism of Drosophila subobscura Genetics, February 1, 2009; 181(2): 803 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. H. Takahashi, K. Tanaka, M. Itoh, and T. Takano-Shimizu Reduced X-Linked Rare Polymorphism in Males in Comparison to Females of Drosophila melanogaster J. Hered., January 1, 2009; 100(1): 97 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Nobrega, M. Khadem, M. Aguade, and C. Segarra Genetic Exchange versus Genetic Differentiation in a Medium-Sized Inversion of Drosophila: The A2/Ast Arrangements of Drosophila subobscura Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2008; 25(8): 1534 - 1543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Dyer, B. Charlesworth, and J. Jaenike Chromosome-wide linkage disequilibrium as a consequence of meiotic drive PNAS, January 30, 2007; 104(5): 1587 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Kennington, L. Partridge, and A. A. Hoffmann Patterns of Diversity and Linkage Disequilibrium Within the Cosmopolitan Inversion In(3R)Payne in Drosophila melanogaster Are Indicative of Coadaptation Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1655 - 1663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Schaeffer and W. W. Anderson Mechanisms of Genetic Exchange Within the Chromosomal Inversions of Drosophila pseudoobscura Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1729 - 1739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



