- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- A corrigendum has been published
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.104.035089v1
169/2/917 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Yandeau-Nelson, M. D.
- Articles by Schnable, P. S.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Yandeau-Nelson, M. D.
- Articles by Schnable, P. S.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on October 16, 2004.
Genetics, Vol. 169, 917-929, February 2005, Copyright © 2005
doi:10.1534/genetics.104.035089
MuDR Transposase Increases the Frequency of Meiotic Crossovers in the Vicinity of a Mu Insertion in the Maize a1 Gene
Marna D. Yandeau-Nelson*,
Qing Zhou*,1,
Hong Yao*,2,
Xiaojie Xu
,3,
Basil J. Nikolau*,
,
and
Patrick S. Schnable*,
,
,**,4
* Interdepartmental Genetics Program, Cellular and Developmental Biology Program
Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology Program
Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology
Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011
** Center for Plant Genomics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011
4 Corresponding author: 2035B Roy J. Carver Co-Laboratory, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.
E-mail: schnable{at}iastate.edu
Although DNA breaks stimulate mitotic recombination in plants, their effects on meiotic recombination are not known. Recombination across a maize a1 allele containing a nonautonomous Mu transposon was studied in the presence and absence of the MuDR-encoded transposase. Recombinant A1' alleles isolated from a1-mum2/a1::rdt heterozygotes arose via either crossovers (32 CO events) or noncrossovers (8 NCO events). In the presence of MuDR, the rate of COs increased fourfold. This increase is most likely a consequence of the repair of MuDR-induced DNA breaks at the Mu1 insertion in a1-mum2. Hence, this study provides the first in vivo evidence that DNA breaks stimulate meiotic crossovers in plants. The distribution of recombination breakpoints is not affected by the presence of MuDR in that 19 of 24 breakpoints isolated from plants that carried MuDR mapped to a previously defined 377-bp recombination hotspot. This result is consistent with the hypothesis that the DNA breaks that initiate recombination at a1 cluster at its 5' end. Conversion tracts associated with eight NCO events ranged in size from <700 bp to >1600 bp. This study also establishes that MuDR functions during meiosis and that ratios of CO/NCO vary among genes and can be influenced by genetic background.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Li, T.-J. Wen, and P. S. Schnable Role of RAD51 in the Repair of MuDR-Induced Double-Strand Breaks in Maize (Zea mays L.) Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 57 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Emrich, L. Li, T.-J. Wen, M. D. Yandeau-Nelson, Y. Fu, L. Guo, H.-H. Chou, S. Aluru, D. A. Ashlock, and P. S. Schnable Nearly Identical Paralogs: Implications for Maize (Zea mays L.) Genome Evolution Genetics, January 1, 2007; 175(1): 429 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Yandeau-Nelson, B. J. Nikolau, and P. S. Schnable Effects of trans-acting Genetic Modifiers on Meiotic Recombination Across the a1-sh2 Interval of Maize Genetics, September 1, 2006; 174(1): 101 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ma and S. A. Jackson Retrotransposon accumulation and satellite amplification mediated by segmental duplication facilitate centromere expansion in rice Genome Res., February 1, 2006; 16(2): 251 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ma, P. SanMiguel, J. Lai, J. Messing, and J. L. Bennetzen DNA Rearrangement in Orthologous Orp Regions of the Maize, Rice and Sorghum Genomes Genetics, July 1, 2005; 170(3): 1209 - 1220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


