- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.104.035824v1
169/2/767 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Sherizen, D.
- Articles by McKim, K. S.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Sherizen, D.
- Articles by McKim, K. S.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on November 15, 2004.
Genetics, Vol. 169, 767-781, February 2005, Copyright © 2005
doi:10.1534/genetics.104.035824
Meiotic Recombination in Drosophila Females Depends on Chromosome Continuity Between Genetically Defined Boundaries
Dalia Sherizen*,
Janet K. Jang*,
Rajal Bhagat*,
Naohiro Kato
,1 and
Kim S. McKim*,2
* Waksman Institute and Department of Genetics, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8020
Biotechnology Center for Agriculture and the Environment, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8020
2 Corresponding author: Waksman Institute, Rutgers University, 190 Frelinghuysen Rd., Piscataway, NJ 08854.
E-mail: mckim{at}rci.rutgers.edu
In the pairing-site model, specialized regions on each chromosome function to establish meiotic homolog pairing. Analysis of these sites could provide insights into the mechanism used by Drosophila females to form a synaptonemal complex (SC) in the absence of meiotic recombination. These specialized sites were first established on the X chromosome by noting that there were barriers to crossover suppression caused by translocation heterozygotes. These sites were genetically mapped and proposed to be pairing sites. By comparing the cytological breakpoints of third chromosome translocations to their patterns of crossover suppression, we have mapped two sites on chromosome 3R. We have performed experiments to determine if these sites have a role in meiotic homolog pairing and the initiation of recombination. Translocation heterozygotes exhibit reduced gene conversion within the crossover-suppressed region, consistent with an effect on the initiation of meiotic recombination. To determine if homolog pairing is disrupted in translocation heterozygotes, we used fluorescent in situ hybridization to measure the extent of homolog pairing. In wild-type oocytes, homologs are paired along their entire lengths prior to accumulation of the SC protein C(3)G. Surprisingly, translocation heterozygotes exhibited homolog pairing similar to wild type within the crossover-suppressed regions. This result contrasted with our observations of c(3)G mutant females, which were found to be defective in pairing. We propose that each Drosophila chromosome is divided into several domains by specialized sites. These sites are not required for homolog pairing. Instead, the initiation of meiotic recombination requires continuity of the meiotic chromosome structure within each of these domains.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. P. Blumenstiel, R. Fu, W. E. Theurkauf, and R. S. Hawley Components of the RNAi Machinery That Mediate Long-Distance Chromosomal Associations Are Dispensable for Meiotic and Early Somatic Homolog Pairing in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, November 1, 2008; 180(3): 1355 - 1365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Thomas and B. D. McKee Meiotic Pairing and Disjunction of Mini-X Chromosomes in Drosophila Is Mediated by 240-bp rDNA Repeats and the Homolog Conjunction Proteins SNM and MNM Genetics, October 1, 2007; 177(2): 785 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Couteau and M. Zetka HTP-1 coordinates synaptonemal complex assembly with homolog alignment during meiosis in C. elegans Genes & Dev., November 15, 2005; 19(22): 2744 - 2756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hammarlund, M. W. Davis, H. Nguyen, D. Dayton, and E. M. Jorgensen Heterozygous Insertions Alter Crossover Distribution but Allow Crossover Interference in Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics, November 1, 2005; 171(3): 1047 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


