- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Supplemental Material
- A corrigendum has been published
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.104.035212v1
169/2/1133 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Broman, K. W.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Broman, K. W.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on November 15, 2004.
Genetics, Vol. 169, 1133-1146, February 2005, Copyright © 2005
doi:10.1534/genetics.104.035212
The Genomes of Recombinant Inbred Lines
Karl W. Broman1
Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
1 Address for correspondence: Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205-2179.
E-mail: kbroman{at}jhsph.edu
Recombinant inbred lines (RILs) can serve as powerful tools for genetic mapping. Recently, members of the Complex Trait Consortium proposed the development of a large panel of eight-way RILs in the mouse, derived from eight genetically diverse parental strains. Such a panel would be a valuable community resource. The use of such eight-way RILs will require a detailed understanding of the relationship between alleles at linked loci on an RI chromosome. We extend the work of Haldane and Waddington on two-way RILs and describe the map expansion, clustering of breakpoints, and other features of the genomes of multiple-strain RILs as a function of the level of crossover interference in meiosis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S.-Y. Su, D. J. Balding, and L. J.M. Coin Disease association tests by inferring ancestral haplotypes using a hidden markov model Bioinformatics, April 1, 2008; 24(7): 972 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yu, J. B. Holland, M. D. McMullen, and E. S. Buckler Genetic Design and Statistical Power of Nested Association Mapping in Maize Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 539 - 551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Crow Haldane, Bailey, Taylor and Recombinant-Inbred Lines Genetics, June 1, 2007; 176(2): 729 - 732. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Macdonald and A. D. Long Joint Estimates of Quantitative Trait Locus Effect and Frequency Using Synthetic Recombinant Populations of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, June 1, 2007; 176(2): 1261 - 1281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Teuscher and K. W. Broman Haplotype Probabilities for Multiple-Strain Recombinant Inbred Lines Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 1267 - 1274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Kao Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci Using the Experimental Designs of Recombinant Inbred Populations Genetics, November 1, 2006; 174(3): 1373 - 1386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Frisch and A. E. Melchinger Marker-Based Prediction of the Parental Genome Contribution to Inbred Lines Derived From Biparental Crosses Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 795 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. de Boer, P. Stam, A. J. J. Dietrich, A. Pastink, and C. Heyting Two levels of interference in mouse meiotic recombination PNAS, June 20, 2006; 103(25): 9607 - 9612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. C. Martin and F. Hospital Two- and Three-Locus Tests for Linkage Analysis Using Recombinant Inbred Lines Genetics, May 1, 2006; 173(1): 451 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


