- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Qin, H.
- Articles by Li, W.-H.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Qin, H.
- Articles by Li, W.-H.
Genetics, Vol. 168, 2245-2260, December 2004, Copyright © 2004
doi:10.1534/genetics.104.030866
Intragenic Spatial Patterns of Codon Usage Bias in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Genomes
Hong Qin*,1,
Wei Biao Wu
,
Josep M. Comeron
,
Martin Kreitman* and
Wen-Hsiung Li*,2
* Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Department of Statistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
2 Corresponding author: Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, 1101 East 57th St., Chicago, IL 60637.
E-mail: whli{at}uchicago.edu
To study the roles of translational accuracy, translational efficiency, and the Hill-Robertson effect in codon usage bias, we studied the intragenic spatial distribution of synonymous codon usage bias in four prokaryotic (Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Sulfolobus tokodaii, and Thermotoga maritima) and two eukaryotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Drosophila melanogaster) genomes. We generated supersequences at each codon position across genes in a genome and computed the overall bias at each codon position. By quantitatively evaluating the trend of spatial patterns using isotonic regression, we show that in yeast and prokaryotic genomes, codon usage bias increases along translational direction, which is consistent with purifying selection against nonsense errors. Fruit fly genes show a nearly symmetric M-shaped spatial pattern of codon usage bias, with less bias in the middle and both ends. The low codon usage bias in the middle region is best explained by interference (the Hill-Robertson effect) between selections at different codon positions. In both yeast and fruit fly, spatial patterns of codon usage bias are characteristically different from patterns of GC-content variations. Effect of expression level on the strength of codon usage bias is more conspicuous than its effect on the shape of the spatial distribution.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Gilchrist, P. Shah, and R. Zaretzki Measuring and Detecting Molecular Adaptation in Codon Usage Against Nonsense Errors During Protein Translation Genetics, December 1, 2009; 183(4): 1493 - 1505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Zeng and B. Charlesworth Estimating Selection Intensity on Synonymous Codon Usage in a Nonequilibrium Population Genetics, October 1, 2009; 183(2): 651 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Huang, E. V. Koonin, D. J. Lipman, and T. M. Przytycka Selection for minimization of translational frameshifting errors as a factor in the evolution of codon usage Nucleic Acids Res., September 10, 2009; (2009) gkp712v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Vicario, C. E. Mason, K. P. White, and J. R. Powell Developmental Stage and Level of Codon Usage Bias in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2008; 25(11): 2269 - 2277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kloster and C. Tang SCUMBLE: a method for systematic and accurate detection of codon usage bias by maximum likelihood estimation Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2008; 36(11): 3819 - 3827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Warnecke and L. D. Hurst Evidence for a Trade-Off between Translational Efficiency and Splicing Regulation in Determining Synonymous Codon Usage in Drosophila melanogaster Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2007; 24(12): 2755 - 2762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Gilchrist Combining Models of Protein Translation and Population Genetics to Predict Protein Production Rates from Codon Usage Patterns Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2007; 24(11): 2362 - 2372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Loewe and B. Charlesworth Background Selection in Single Genes May Explain Patterns of Codon Bias Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 1381 - 1393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Stoletzki and A. Eyre-Walker Synonymous Codon Usage in Escherichia coli: Selection for Translational Accuracy Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2007; 24(2): 374 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Presgraves Intron Length Evolution in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2006; 23(11): 2203 - 2213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Fuglsang Accounting for Background Nucleotide Composition When Measuring Codon Usage Bias: Brilliant Idea, Difficult in Practice Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2006; 23(7): 1345 - 1347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Akashi, W.-Y. Ko, S. Piao, A. John, P. Goel, C.-F. Lin, and A. P. Vitins Molecular Evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Subgroup: Frequent Parameter Fluctuations on the Timescale of Molecular Divergence Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1711 - 1726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Comeron and T. B. Guthrie Intragenic Hill-Robertson Interference Influences Selection Intensity on Synonymous Mutations in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2005; 22(12): 2519 - 2530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


