Genetics, Vol. 168, 2245-2260, December 2004, Copyright © 2004
doi:10.1534/genetics.104.030866

Intragenic Spatial Patterns of Codon Usage Bias in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Genomes

* Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
{dagger} Department of Statistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
{ddagger} Department of Biological Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242

2 Corresponding author: Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, 1101 East 57th St., Chicago, IL 60637.
E-mail: whli{at}uchicago.edu

To study the roles of translational accuracy, translational efficiency, and the Hill-Robertson effect in codon usage bias, we studied the intragenic spatial distribution of synonymous codon usage bias in four prokaryotic (Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Sulfolobus tokodaii, and Thermotoga maritima) and two eukaryotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Drosophila melanogaster) genomes. We generated supersequences at each codon position across genes in a genome and computed the overall bias at each codon position. By quantitatively evaluating the trend of spatial patterns using isotonic regression, we show that in yeast and prokaryotic genomes, codon usage bias increases along translational direction, which is consistent with purifying selection against nonsense errors. Fruit fly genes show a nearly symmetric M-shaped spatial pattern of codon usage bias, with less bias in the middle and both ends. The low codon usage bias in the middle region is best explained by interference (the Hill-Robertson effect) between selections at different codon positions. In both yeast and fruit fly, spatial patterns of codon usage bias are characteristically different from patterns of GC-content variations. Effect of expression level on the strength of codon usage bias is more conspicuous than its effect on the shape of the spatial distribution.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. A. Gilchrist, P. Shah, and R. Zaretzki
Measuring and Detecting Molecular Adaptation in Codon Usage Against Nonsense Errors During Protein Translation
Genetics, December 1, 2009; 183(4): 1493 - 1505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. Zeng and B. Charlesworth
Estimating Selection Intensity on Synonymous Codon Usage in a Nonequilibrium Population
Genetics, October 1, 2009; 183(2): 651 - 662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
Y. Huang, E. V. Koonin, D. J. Lipman, and T. M. Przytycka
Selection for minimization of translational frameshifting errors as a factor in the evolution of codon usage
Nucleic Acids Res., September 10, 2009; (2009) gkp712v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Vicario, C. E. Mason, K. P. White, and J. R. Powell
Developmental Stage and Level of Codon Usage Bias in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2008; 25(11): 2269 - 2277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Kloster and C. Tang
SCUMBLE: a method for systematic and accurate detection of codon usage bias by maximum likelihood estimation
Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2008; 36(11): 3819 - 3827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
T. Warnecke and L. D. Hurst
Evidence for a Trade-Off between Translational Efficiency and Splicing Regulation in Determining Synonymous Codon Usage in Drosophila melanogaster
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2007; 24(12): 2755 - 2762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. A. Gilchrist
Combining Models of Protein Translation and Population Genetics to Predict Protein Production Rates from Codon Usage Patterns
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2007; 24(11): 2362 - 2372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
L. Loewe and B. Charlesworth
Background Selection in Single Genes May Explain Patterns of Codon Bias
Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 1381 - 1393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. Stoletzki and A. Eyre-Walker
Synonymous Codon Usage in Escherichia coli: Selection for Translational Accuracy
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2007; 24(2): 374 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. C. Presgraves
Intron Length Evolution in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2006; 23(11): 2203 - 2213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. Fuglsang
Accounting for Background Nucleotide Composition When Measuring Codon Usage Bias: Brilliant Idea, Difficult in Practice
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2006; 23(7): 1345 - 1347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. Akashi, W.-Y. Ko, S. Piao, A. John, P. Goel, C.-F. Lin, and A. P. Vitins
Molecular Evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Subgroup: Frequent Parameter Fluctuations on the Timescale of Molecular Divergence
Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1711 - 1726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. M. Comeron and T. B. Guthrie
Intragenic Hill-Robertson Interference Influences Selection Intensity on Synonymous Mutations in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2005; 22(12): 2519 - 2530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]