- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by van der Knaap, E.
- Articles by Tanksley, S. D.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by van der Knaap, E.
- Articles by Tanksley, S. D.
Genetics, Vol. 168, 2127-2140, December 2004, Copyright © 2004
doi:10.1534/genetics.104.031013
High-Resolution Fine Mapping and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Analysis of sun, a Locus Controlling Tomato Fruit Shape, Reveals a Region of the Tomato Genome Prone to DNA Rearrangements
E. van der Knaap*,
,1,
A. Sanyal
,
S. A. Jackson
and
S. D. Tanksley
* Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio State University/OARDC, Wooster, Ohio 44691
Department of Plant Breeding and Department of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
1 Corresponding author: Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio State University/OARDC, 1680 Madison Ave., Wooster, OH 44691.
E-mail: vanderknaap.1{at}osu.edu
The locus sun on the short arm of tomato chromosome 7 controls morphology of the fruit. Alleles from wild relatives impart a round shape, while alleles from certain cultivated varieties impart an oval shape typical of roma-type tomatoes. We fine mapped the locus in two populations and investigated the genome organization of the region spanning and flanking sun. The first high-resolution genetic map of the sun locus was constructed using a nearly isogenic F2 population derived from a cross between Lycopersicon pennellii introgression line IL7-4 and L. esculentum cv Sun1642. The mapping combined with results from pachytene FISH experiments demonstrated that the top of chromosome 7 is inverted in L. pennellii accession LA716. sun was located close to the chromosomal breakpoint and within the inversion, thereby precluding map-based cloning of the gene using this population. The fruit-shape locus was subsequently fine mapped in a population derived from a cross between L. esculentum Sun1642 and L. pimpinellifolium LA1589. Chromosome walking using clones identified from several large genomic insert libraries resulted in two noncontiguous contigs flanking sun. Fiber-FISH analysis showed that distance between the two contigs measured 68 kb in L. esculentum Sun1642 and 38 kb in L. pimpinellifolium LA1589, respectively. The sun locus mapped between the two contigs, suggesting that allelic variation at this locus may be due to an insertion/deletion event. The results demonstrate that sun is located in a highly dynamic region of the tomato genome.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Tang, D. Szinay, C. Lang, M. S. Ramanna, E. A. G. van der Vossen, E. Datema, R. K. Lankhorst, J. de Boer, S. A. Peters, C. Bachem, et al. Cross-Species Bacterial Artificial Chromosome-Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Painting of the Tomato and Potato Chromosome 6 Reveals Undescribed Chromosomal Rearrangements Genetics, November 1, 2008; 180(3): 1319 - 1328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Moyle and T. Nakazato Comparative Genetics of Hybrid Incompatibility: Sterility in Two Solanum Species Crosses Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1437 - 1453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-H. Koo, S.-H. Jo, J.-W. Bang, H.-M. Park, S. Lee, and D. Choi Integration of Cytogenetic and Genetic Linkage Maps Unveils the Physical Architecture of Tomato Chromosome 2 Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1211 - 1220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Xiao, N. Jiang, E. Schaffner, E. J. Stockinger, and E. van der Knaap A Retrotransposon-Mediated Gene Duplication Underlies Morphological Variation of Tomato Fruit Science, March 14, 2008; 319(5869): 1527 - 1530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Schauer, Y. Semel, I. Balbo, M. Steinfath, D. Repsilber, J. Selbig, T. Pleban, D. Zamir, and A. R. Fernie Mode of Inheritance of Primary Metabolic Traits in Tomato PLANT CELL, March 1, 2008; 20(3): 509 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Jones, C. M. Rick, D. Adams, J. Jernstedt, and R. T. Chetelat Genealogy and fine mapping of obscuravenosa, a gene affecting the distribution of chloroplasts in leaf veins, and evidence of selection during breeding of tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum; Solanaceae) Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2007; 94(6): 935 - 947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Brewer, J. B. Moyseenko, A. J. Monforte, and E. van der Knaap Morphological variation in tomato: a comprehensive study of quantitative trait loci controlling fruit shape and development J. Exp. Bot., April 1, 2007; 58(6): 1339 - 1349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sherman-Broyles, N. Boggs, A. Farkas, P. Liu, J. Vrebalov, M. E. Nasrallah, and J. B. Nasrallah S Locus Genes and the Evolution of Self-Fertility in Arabidopsis thaliana PLANT CELL, January 1, 2007; 19(1): 94 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Canady, Y. Ji, and R. T. Chetelat Homeologous Recombination in Solanum lycopersicoides Introgression Lines of Cultivated Tomato Genetics, December 1, 2006; 174(4): 1775 - 1788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Long Plant development: new models and approaches bring progress Development, December 1, 2006; 133(23): 4609 - 4612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Brewer, L. Lang, K. Fujimura, N. Dujmovic, S. Gray, and E. van der Knaap Development of a controlled vocabulary and software application to analyze fruit shape variation in tomato and other plant species. Plant Physiology, May 1, 2006; 141(1): 15 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






