- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Wahl, L. M.
- Articles by DeHaan, C. S.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Wahl, L. M.
- Articles by DeHaan, C. S.
Genetics, Vol. 168, 1009-1018, October 2004, Copyright © 2004
doi:10.1534/genetics.104.029199
Fixation Probability Favors Increased Fecundity Over Reduced Generation Time
L. M. Wahl1 and C. S. DeHaan
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada
1 Corresponding author: Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada.
E-mail: lwahl{at}uwo.ca
The cornerstone of population genetics is a probabilistic understanding of the ultimate fatesurvival or extinctionof rare mutations. If a mutation is beneficial, it enables its carrier to reproduce faster than native wild-type individuals. In classic derivations and in the considerable body of research that has followed, "faster" has been defined mathematically to mean "able to produce more surviving offspring per generation." Many organisms, however, may increase their reproductive rate by producing the same number of offspring in a shorter generation time: a mutant bacterium, for example, may complete the cell cycle and produce two offspring more quickly than the wild type. We find that the ultimate fixation probability of a mutation conferring a shorter generation time differs from that of a mutation conferring more offspring by a factor of 2 ln(2)nearly 40%. This predicts a reduction in the overall substitution rate for any mutation that decreases the generation time: fixation probability is biased toward increased offspring number.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Handel and M. R. Bennett Surviving the Bottleneck: Transmission Mutants and the Evolution of Microbial Populations Genetics, December 1, 2008; 180(4): 2193 - 2200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z Patwa and L.M Wahl The fixation probability of beneficial mutations J R Soc Interface, November 6, 2008; 5(28): 1279 - 1289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Patwa and L. M. Wahl Fixation Probability for Lytic Viruses: The Attachment-Lysis Model Genetics, September 1, 2008; 180(1): 459 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Hubbarde, G. Wild, and L. M. Wahl Fixation Probabilities When Generation Times Are Variable: The Burst Death Model Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1703 - 1712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wakeley The Limits of Theoretical Population Genetics Genetics, January 1, 2005; 169(1): 1 - 7. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

