Genetics, Vol. 168, 463-475, September 2004, Copyright © 2004
doi:10.1534/genetics.103.024745

Population Genetics of Polymorphism and Divergence for Diploid Selection Models With Arbitrary Dominance

Department of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

1 Corresponding author: Department of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, 434 Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
E-mail: sw292{at}cornell.edu

We develop a Poisson random-field model of polymorphism and divergence that allows arbitrary dominance relations in a diploid context. This model provides a maximum-likelihood framework for estimating both selection and dominance parameters of new mutations using information on the frequency spectrum of sequence polymorphisms. This is the first DNA sequence-based estimator of the dominance parameter. Our model also leads to a likelihood-ratio test for distinguishing nongenic from genic selection; simulations indicate that this test is quite powerful when a large number of segregating sites are available. We also use simulations to explore the bias in selection parameter estimates caused by unacknowledged dominance relations. When inference is based on the frequency spectrum of polymorphisms, genic selection estimates of the selection parameter can be very strongly biased even for minor deviations from the genic selection model. Surprisingly, however, when inference is based on polymorphism and divergence (McDonald-Kreitman) data, genic selection estimates of the selection parameter are nearly unbiased, even for completely dominant or recessive mutations. Further, we find that weak overdominant selection can increase, rather than decrease, the substitution rate relative to levels of polymorphism. This nonintuitive result has major implications for the interpretation of several popular tests of neutrality.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome ResHome page
R. Nielsen, M. J. Hubisz, I. Hellmann, D. Torgerson, A. M. Andres, A. Albrechtsen, R. Gutenkunst, M. D. Adams, M. Cargill, A. Boyko, et al.
Darwinian and demographic forces affecting human protein coding genes
Genome Res., May 1, 2009; 19(5): 838 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Osada, S. Mano, and J. Gojobori
Quantifying dominance and deleterious effect on human disease genes
PNAS, January 20, 2009; 106(3): 841 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
E. Huerta-Sanchez, R. Durrett, and C. D. Bustamante
Population Genetics of Polymorphism and Divergence Under Fluctuating Selection
Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 325 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
P. L.F. Johnson and M. Slatkin
Inference of population genetic parameters in metagenomics: A clean look at messy data
Genome Res., October 1, 2006; 16(10): 1320 - 1327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. M. Comeron
Weak selection and recent mutational changes influence polymorphic synonymous mutations in humans
PNAS, May 2, 2006; 103(18): 6940 - 6945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
L. Loewe, B. Charlesworth, C. Bartolome, and V. Noel
Estimating Selection on Nonsynonymous Mutations
Genetics, February 1, 2006; 172(2): 1079 - 1092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. M. Comeron and T. B. Guthrie
Intragenic Hill-Robertson Interference Influences Selection Intensity on Synonymous Mutations in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2005; 22(12): 2519 - 2530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
L. Zhu and C. D. Bustamante
A Composite-Likelihood Approach for Detecting Directional Selection From DNA Sequence Data
Genetics, July 1, 2005; 170(3): 1411 - 1421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. H. Williamson, R. Hernandez, A. Fledel-Alon, L. Zhu, R. Nielsen, and C. D. Bustamante
Simultaneous inference of selection and population growth from patterns of variation in the human genome
PNAS, May 31, 2005; 102(22): 7882 - 7887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]