- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Meiklejohn, C. D.
- Articles by Parsch, J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Meiklejohn, C. D.
- Articles by Parsch, J.
Genetics, Vol. 168, 265-279, September 2004, Copyright © 2004
doi:10.1534/genetics.103.025494
Identification of a Locus Under Complex Positive Selection in Drosophila simulans by Haplotype Mapping and Composite-Likelihood Estimation
Colin D. Meiklejohn*,1,
Yuseob Kim
,2,
Daniel L. Hartl* and
John Parsch
* Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Department of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
Department of Biology II, Section of Evolutionary Biology, University of Munich (LMU), 80333 Munich, Germany
1 Corresponding author: Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138.
E-mail: cmeiklejohn{at}oeb.harvard.edu
The recent action of positive selection is expected to influence patterns of intraspecific DNA sequence variation in chromosomal regions linked to the selected locus. These effects include decreased polymorphism, increased linkage disequilibrium, and an increased frequency of derived variants. These effects are all expected to dissipate with distance from the selected locus due to recombination. Therefore, in regions of high recombination, it should be possible to localize a target of selection to a relatively small interval. Previously described patterns of intraspecific variation in three tandemly arranged, testes-expressed genes (janusA, janusB, and ocnus) in Drosophila simulans included all three of these features. Here we expand the original sample and also survey nucleotide polymorphism at three neighboring loci. On the basis of recombination events between derived and ancestral alleles, we localize the target of selection to a 1.5-kb region surrounding janusB. A composite-likelihood-ratio test based on the spatial distribution and frequency of derived polymorphic variants corroborates this result and provides an estimate of the strength of selection. However, the data are difficult to reconcile with the simplest model of positive selection, whereas a new composite-likelihood method suggests that the data are better described by a model in which the selected allele has not yet gone to fixation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. F. Baines, S. A. Sawyer, D. L. Hartl, and J. Parsch Effects of X-Linkage and Sex-Biased Gene Expression on the Rate of Adaptive Protein Evolution in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2008; 25(8): 1639 - 1650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Sawyer, J. Parsch, Z. Zhang, and D. L. Hartl Inaugural Article: Prevalence of positive selection among nearly neutral amino acid replacements in Drosophila PNAS, April 17, 2007; 104(16): 6504 - 6510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sanchez-Gracia and J. Rozas Unusual Pattern of Nucleotide Sequence Variation at the OS-E and OS-F Genomic Regions of Drosophila simulans Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1923 - 1935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hasselmann and M. Beye Pronounced Differences of Recombination Activity at the Sex Determination Locus of the Honeybee, a Locus Under Strong Balancing Selection Genetics, November 1, 2006; 174(3): 1469 - 1480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Proschel, Z. Zhang, and J. Parsch Widespread Adaptive Evolution of Drosophila Genes With Sex-Biased Expression Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 893 - 900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Glinka, D. De Lorenzo, and W. Stephan Evidence of Gene Conversion Associated with a Selective Sweep in Drosophila melanogaster Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2006; 23(10): 1869 - 1878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Quesada, S. E. Ramos-Onsins, J. Rozas, and M. Aguade Positive Selection Versus Demography: Evolutionary Inferences Based on an Unusual Haplotype Structure in Drosophila simulans Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2006; 23(9): 1643 - 1647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Soejima, H. Tachida, T. Ishida, A. Sano, and Y. Koda Evidence for Recent Positive Selection at the Human AIM1 Locus in a European Population Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2006; 23(1): 179 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Wagstaff and D. J. Begun Molecular Population Genetics of Accessory Gland Protein Genes and Testis-Expressed Genes in Drosophila mojavensis and D. arizonae Genetics, November 1, 2005; 171(3): 1083 - 1101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Jensen, Y. Kim, V. B. DuMont, C. F. Aquadro, and C. D. Bustamante Distinguishing Between Selective Sweeps and Demography Using DNA Polymorphism Data Genetics, July 1, 2005; 170(3): 1401 - 1410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


