- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Supplemental Material
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Zhang, J.
- Articles by Peterson, T.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Zhang, J.
- Articles by Peterson, T.
Genetics, Vol. 167, 1929-1937, August 2004, Copyright © 2004
doi:10.1534/genetics.103.026229
Transposition of Reversed Ac Element Ends Generates Chromosome Rearrangements in Maize
Jianbo Zhang and Thomas Peterson1
Department of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology and Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011
1 Corresponding author: Department of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology and Department of Agronomy, 2208 Molecular Biology Bldg., Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-3260.
E-mail: thomasp{at}iastate.edu
In classical "cut-and-paste" transposition, transposons are excised from donor sites and inserted at new locations. We have identified an alternative pathway in which transposition involves the 5' end of an intact Ac element and the 3' end of a nearby terminally deleted fAc (fractured Ac). The Ac and fAc elements are inserted at the maize p1 locus on chromosome 1s in the same orientation; the adjacent ends of the separate elements are thus in reversed orientation with respect to each other and are separated by a distance of
13 kb. Transposition involving the two ends in reversed orientation generates inversions, deletions, and a novel type of local rearrangement. The rearrangement breakpoints are bounded by the characteristic footprint or target site duplications typical of Ac transposition reactions. These results demonstrate a new intramolecular transposition mechanism by which transposons can greatly impact genome evolution.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. F. Weil Too many ends: aberrant transposition Genes & Dev., May 1, 2009; 23(9): 1032 - 1036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhang, C. Yu, V. Pulletikurti, J. Lamb, T. Danilova, D. F. Weber, J. Birchler, and T. Peterson Alternative Ac/Ds transposition induces major chromosomal rearrangements in maize Genes & Dev., March 15, 2009; 23(6): 755 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Messing Synergy of Two Reference Genomes for the Grass Family Plant Physiology, January 1, 2009; 149(1): 117 - 124. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Huang and H. K. Dooner Macrotransposition and Other Complex Chromosomal Restructuring in Maize by Closely Linked Transposons in Direct Orientation PLANT CELL, August 1, 2008; 20(8): 2019 - 2032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Conrad, L. Bai, K. Ahern, K. Dusinberre, D. P. Kane, and T. P. Brutnell State II Dissociation Element Formation Following Activator Excision in Maize Genetics, October 1, 2007; 177(2): 737 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Pace II and C. Feschotte The evolutionary history of human DNA transposons: Evidence for intense activity in the primate lineage Genome Res., April 1, 2007; 17(4): 422 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Yu, J. C. Lamb, F. Han, and J. A. Birchler Cytological Visualization of DNA Transposons and Their Transposition Pattern in Somatic Cells of Maize Genetics, January 1, 2007; 175(1): 31 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhang and T. Peterson A Segmental Deletion Series Generated by Sister-Chromatid Transposition of Ac Transposable Elements in Maize Genetics, September 1, 2005; 171(1): 333 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




