- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Sundström, H.
- Articles by Ellegren, H.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Sundström, H.
- Articles by Ellegren, H.
Reduced Variation on the Chicken Z Chromosome
Hannah Sundströma, Matthew T. Webstera, and Hans Ellegrenaa Department of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
Corresponding author: Hans Ellegren, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden., hans.ellegren{at}ebc.uu.se (E-mail)
Communicating editor: N. A. JENKINS
W = 5.8 ± 0.8 x 103) and one every 156 bp on the Z chromosome (
W = 1.4 ± 0.4 x 103). This difference may in part be due to a low male effective population size arising from skewed reproductive success among males, evident both in the wild ancestorthe red jungle fowland in poultry breeding. However, this effect cannot entirely explain the observed three- to fourfold reduction in Z chromosome diversity. Selection, in particular selective sweeps, may therefore have had an impact on reducing variation on the Z chromosome, a hypothesis supported by the observation of heterogeneity in diversity levels among loci on the Z chromosome and the lower recombination rate on Z than on autosomes. Selection on sex-linked genes may be particularly important in organisms with female heterogamety since the heritability of sex-linked sexually antagonistic alleles advantageous to males is improved when fathers pass a Z chromosome to their sons.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. E. Janes, T. Ezaz, J. A. Marshall Graves, and S. V. Edwards Recombination and Nucleotide Diversity in the Sex Chromosomal Pseudoautosomal Region of the Emu, Dromaius novaehollandiae J. Hered., March 1, 2009; 100(2): 125 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Janes, C. Organ, and N. Valenzuela New resources inform study of genome size, content, and organization in nonavian reptiles Integr. Comp. Biol., October 1, 2008; 48(4): 447 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Brandstrom and H. Ellegren Genome-wide analysis of microsatellite polymorphism in chicken circumventing the ascertainment bias Genome Res., June 1, 2008; 18(6): 881 - 887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zhou, M. Lei, Y. Rao, Q. Nie, H. Zeng, M. Xia, F. Liang, D. Zhang, and X. Zhang Polymorphisms of Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide Receptor-1 Gene and Their Genetic Effects on Broodiness in Chickens Poult. Sci., May 1, 2008; 87(5): 893 - 903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Mank, E. Axelsson, and H. Ellegren Fast-X on the Z: Rapid evolution of sex-linked genes in birds Genome Res., May 1, 2007; 17(5): 618 - 624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Baines and B. Harr Reduced X-Linked Diversity in Derived Populations of House Mice Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1911 - 1921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Thornton, D. Bachtrog, and P. Andolfatto X chromosomes and autosomes evolve at similar rates in Drosophila: No evidence for faster-X protein evolution Genome Res., April 1, 2006; 16(4): 498 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Borge, M. T. Webster, G. Andersson, and G.-P. Saetre Contrasting Patterns of Polymorphism and Divergence on the Z Chromosome and Autosomes in Two Ficedula Flycatcher Species Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1861 - 1873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Berlin and H. Ellegren Chicken W: A genetically uniform chromosome in a highly variable genome PNAS, November 9, 2004; 101(45): 15967 - 15969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





