Genetics, Vol. 166, 1995-1999, April 2004, Copyright © 2004

Genomic Background Predicts the Fate of Duplicated Genes: Evidence From the Yeast Genome

Ze Zhanga,b and Hirohisa Kishinoa
a Laboratory of Biometrics and Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
b Institute for Bioinformatics Research and Development, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Tokyo 102-0081, Japan

Corresponding author: Ze Zhang, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.

Communicating editor: S. YOKOYAMA

Gene duplication with subsequent divergence plays a central role in the acquisition of genes with novel function and complexity during the course of evolution. With reduced functional constraints or through positive selection, these duplicated genes may experience accelerated evolution. Under the model of subfunctionalization, loss of subfunctions leads to complementary acceleration at sites with two copies, and the difference in average rate between the sequences may not be obvious. On the other hand, the classical model of neofunctionalization predicts that the evolutionary rate in one of the two duplicates is accelerated. However, the classical model does not tell which of the duplicates experiences the acceleration in evolutionary rate. Here, we present evidence from the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome that a duplicate located in a genomic region with a low-recombination rate is likely to evolve faster than a duplicate in an area of high recombination. This observation is consistent with population genetics theory that predicts that purifying selection is less effective in genomic regions of low recombination (Hill-Robertson effect). Together with previous studies, our results suggest the genomic background (e.g., local recombination rate) as a potential force to drive the divergence between nontandemly duplicated genes. This implies the importance of structure and complexity of genomes in the diversification of organisms via gene duplications.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome ResHome page
M. V. Han, J. P. Demuth, C. L. McGrath, C. Casola, and M. W. Hahn
Adaptive evolution of young gene duplicates in mammals
Genome Res., May 1, 2009; 19(5): 859 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
H. M. Fischer, C. W. Wheat, D. G. Heckel, and H. Vogel
Evolutionary Origins of a Novel Host Plant Detoxification Gene in Butterflies
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2008; 25(5): 809 - 820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
L. J. Leach, Z. Zhang, C. Lu, M. J. Kearsey, and Z. Luo
The Role of Cis-Regulatory Motifs and Genetical Control of Expression in the Divergence of Yeast Duplicate Genes
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2007; 24(11): 2556 - 2565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
X. He and J. Zhang
Higher Duplicability of Less Important Genes in Yeast Genomes
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2006; 23(1): 144 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
L. Kuepfer, U. Sauer, and L. M. Blank
Metabolic functions of duplicate genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Genome Res., October 1, 2005; 15(10): 1421 - 1430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. L. Prigoda, A. Nassuth, and B. K. Mable
Phenotypic and Genotypic Expression of Self-incompatibility Haplotypes in Arabidopsis lyrata Suggests Unique Origin of Alleles in Different Dominance Classes
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2005; 22(7): 1609 - 1620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
P. H. Shah, R. C. MacFarlane, D. Bhattacharya, J. C. Matese, J. Demeter, S. E. Stroup, and U. Singh
Comparative Genomic Hybridizations of Entamoeba Strains Reveal Unique Genetic Fingerprints That Correlate with Virulence
Eukaryot. Cell, March 1, 2005; 4(3): 504 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
K. Thornton and M. Long
Excess of Amino Acid Substitutions Relative to Polymorphism Between X-Linked Duplications in Drosophila melanogaster
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2005; 22(2): 273 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]