help button home button Genetics Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donaldson, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Courcelle, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donaldson, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Courcelle, J.
Genetics, Vol. 166, 1631-1640, April 2004, Copyright © 2004

RuvAB and RecG Are Not Essential for the Recovery of DNA Synthesis Following UV-Induced DNA Damage in Escherichia coli

Janet R. Donaldsona, Charmain T. Courcellea, and Justin Courcellea
a Department of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762

Corresponding author: Janet R. Donaldson, Mississippi State University, Box GY, Mississippi State, MS 39762., jrp12{at}msstate.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: G. R. SMITH

Ultraviolet light induces DNA lesions that block the progression of the replication machinery. Several models speculate that the resumption of replication following disruption by UV-induced DNA damage requires regression of the nascent DNA or migration of the replication machinery away from the blocking lesion to allow repair or bypass of the lesion to occur. Both RuvAB and RecG catalyze branch migration of three- and four-stranded DNA junctions in vitro and are proposed to catalyze fork regression in vivo. To examine this possibility, we characterized the recovery of DNA synthesis in ruvAB and recG mutants. We found that in the absence of either RecG or RuvAB, arrested replication forks are maintained and DNA synthesis is resumed with kinetics that are similar to those in wild-type cells. The data presented here indicate that RecG- or RuvAB-catalyzed fork regression is not essential for DNA synthesis to resume following arrest by UV-induced DNA damage in vivo.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
J. Kang and M. J. Blaser
Repair and Antirepair DNA Helicases in Helicobacter pylori
J. Bacteriol., June 15, 2008; 190(12): 4218 - 4224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
J. J. Belle, A. Casey, C. T. Courcelle, and J. Courcelle
Inactivation of the DnaB Helicase Leads to the Collapse and Degradation of the Replication Fork: a Comparison to UV-Induced Arrest
J. Bacteriol., August 1, 2007; 189(15): 5452 - 5462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
I. Ivancic-Bace, I. Vlasic, G. Cogelja-Cajo, K. Brcic-Kostic, and E. Salaj-Smic
Roles of PriA Protein and Double-Strand DNA Break Repair Functions in UV-Induced Restriction Alleviation in Escherichia coli
Genetics, December 1, 2006; 174(4): 2137 - 2149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. R. Donaldson, C. T. Courcelle, and J. Courcelle
RuvABC Is Required to Resolve Holliday Junctions That Accumulate following Replication on Damaged Templates in Escherichia coli
J. Biol. Chem., September 29, 2006; 281(39): 28811 - 28821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. Sanchez, D. Kidane, P. Reed, F. A. Curtis, M. C. Cozar, P. L. Graumann, G. J. Sharples, and J. C. Alonso
The RuvAB Branch Migration Translocase and RecU Holliday Junction Resolvase Are Required for Double-Stranded DNA Break Repair in Bacillus subtilis
Genetics, November 1, 2005; 171(3): 873 - 883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
A. I. Ozgenc, E. S. Szekeres, and C. W. Lawrence
In Vivo Evidence for a recA-Independent Recombination Process in Escherichia coli That Permits Completion of Replication of DNA Containing UV Damage in Both Strands
J. Bacteriol., March 15, 2005; 187(6): 1974 - 1984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. Michel, G. Grompone, M.-J. Flores, and V. Bidnenko
Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks
PNAS, August 31, 2004; 101(35): 12783 - 12788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Genetics Society of America.