Fitness of Anopheline Mosquitoes Expressing Transgenes That Inhibit Plasmodium Development

Corresponding author: Marcelo Jacobs-Lorena, Malaria Research Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205-2179., mlorena{at}jhsph.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: A. J. LOPEZ

One potential strategy for the control of malaria and other vector-borne diseases is the introduction into wild vector populations of genetic constructs that reduce vectorial capacity. An important caveat of this approach is that the genetic construct should have minimal fitness cost to the transformed vector. Previously, we produced transgenic Anopheles stephensi expressing either of two effector genes, a tetramer of the SM1 dodecapeptide or the phospholipase A2 gene (PLA2) from honeybee venom. Mosquitoes carrying either of these transgenes were impaired for Plasmodium berghei transmission. We have investigated the role of two effector genes for malaria parasite blockage in terms of the fitness imposed to the mosquito vector that expresses either molecule. By measuring mosquito survival, fecundity, fertility, and by running population cage experiments, we found that mosquitoes transformed with the SM1 construct showed no significant reduction in these fitness parameters relative to nontransgenic controls. The PLA2 transgenics, however, had reduced fitness that seemed to be independent of the insertion site of the transgene. We conclude that the fitness load imposed by refractory gene(s)-expressing mosquitoes depends on the effect of the transgenic protein produced in that mosquito. These results have important implications for implementation of malaria control via genetic modification of mosquitoes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Li, M. T. Marrelli, G. Yan, and M. Jacobs-Lorena Fitness of Transgenic Anopheles stephensi Mosquitoes Expressing the SM1 Peptide under the Control of a Vitellogenin Promoter J. Hered., May 1, 2008; 99(3): 275 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Marshall The Impact of Dissociation on Transposon-Mediated Disease Control Strategies Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1673 - 1682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. G. J. Knols, H. C. Bossin, W. R. Mukabana, and A. S. Robinson Transgenic Mosquitoes and the Fight Against Malaria: Managing Technology Push in a Turbulent GMO World Am J Trop Med Hyg, December 1, 2007; 77(6_Suppl): 232 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Huho, K. R. Ng'habi, G. F. Killeen, G. Nkwengulila, B. G. J. Knols, and H. M. Ferguson Nature beats nurture: a case study of the physiological fitness of free-living and laboratory-reared male Anopheles gambiae s.l. J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2007; 210(16): 2939 - 2947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P. Atkinson, Z. Su, N. Alphey, L. S. Alphey, P. G. Coleman, and L. M. Wein Analyzing the control of mosquito-borne diseases by a dominant lethal genetic system PNAS, May 29, 2007; 104(22): 9540 - 9545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. T. Marrelli, C. Li, J. L. Rasgon, and M. Jacobs-Lorena Transgenic malaria-resistant mosquitoes have a fitness advantage when feeding on Plasmodium-infected blood PNAS, March 27, 2007; 104(13): 5580 - 5583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Magori and F. Gould Genetically Engineered Underdominance for Manipulation of Pest Populations: A Deterministic Model Genetics, April 1, 2006; 172(4): 2613 - 2620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Zhong, E. A. Temu, T. Guda, L. Gouagna, D. Menge, A. Pai, J. Githure, J. C. Beier, and G. Yan Dynamics of Gene Introgression in the African Malaria Vector Anopheles gambiae Genetics, April 1, 2006; 172(4): 2359 - 2365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-J. CHA, A. MORI, D. D. CHADEE, and D. W. SEVERSON CAGE TRIALS USING AN ENDOGENOUS MEIOTIC DRIVE GENE IN THE MOSQUITO AEDES AEGYPTI TO PROMOTE POPULATION REPLACEMENT Am J Trop Med Hyg, January 1, 2006; 74(1): 62 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]