Genetics, Vol. 166, 1303-1311, March 2004, Copyright © 2004

Do Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) for a Courtship Song Difference Between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia Coincide With Candidate Genes and Intraspecific QTL?

Jennifer M. Gleasona and Michael G. Ritchiea
a School of Biology, University of Saint Andrews, Saint Andrews, Fife KY16 9TH, Scotland

Corresponding author: Jennifer M. Gleason, 1200 Sunnyside Ave., University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045., jgleason{at}ku.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: M. A. F. NOOR

The genetic architecture of traits influencing sexual isolation can give insight into the evolution of reproductive isolation and hence speciation. Here we report a quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis of the difference in mean interpulse interval (IPI), an important component of the male courtship song, between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Using a backcross analysis, we find six QTL that explain a total of 40.7% of the phenotypic variance. Three candidate genes are located in the intervals bounded by two of the QTL and there are no significant QTL on the X chromosome. The values of mean IPI for hybrid individuals imply the presence of dominant alleles or epistasis. Because unisexual hybrid sterility prevents an F2 analysis, we cannot distinguish dominant from additive genetic effects at the scale of QTL. A comparison with a study of QTL for intraspecific variation in D. melanogaster shows that, for these strains, the QTL we have identified for interspecific variation cannot be those that contribute to intraspecific variation. We find that the QTL have bidirectional effects, which indicates that the genetic architecture is compatible with divergence due to genetic drift, although other possibilities are discussed.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
N. H. Martin, A. C. Bouck, and M. L. Arnold
The Genetic Architecture of Reproductive Isolation in Louisiana Irises: Flowering Phenology
Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1803 - 1812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
K. S. Kendler and R. J. Greenspan
The Nature of Genetic Influences on Behavior: Lessons From "Simpler" Organisms
Am J Psychiatry, October 1, 2006; 163(10): 1683 - 1694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. J. Moehring, A. Llopart, S. Elwyn, J. A. Coyne, and T. F. C. Mackay
The Genetic Basis of Prezygotic Reproductive Isolation Between Drosophila santomea and D. yakuba Due to Mating Preference
Genetics, May 1, 2006; 173(1): 215 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. T. Groot, J. L. Horovitz, J. Hamilton, R. G. Santangelo, C. Schal, and F. Gould
Experimental evidence for interspecific directional selection on moth pheromone communication
PNAS, April 11, 2006; 103(15): 5858 - 5863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. M. Gleason, J.-M. Jallon, J.-D. Rouault, and M. G. Ritchie
Quantitative Trait Loci for Cuticular Hydrocarbons Associated With Sexual Isolation Between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia
Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1789 - 1798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]