Genetics, Vol. 166, 789-796, February 2004, Copyright © 2004

Genetic Complexity Underlying Hybrid Male Sterility in Drosophila

Kyoichi Sawamuraa, John Rooteb, Chung-I Wuc, and Masa-Toshi Yamamotoa
a Drosophila Genetic Resource Center, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Kyoto 616-8354, Japan,
b Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EH, United Kingdom
c Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637

Corresponding author: Kyoichi Sawamura, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan., sawamura{at}biol.tsukuba.ac.jp (E-mail)

Communicating editor: M. AGUADÉ

Recent genetic analyses of closely related species of Drosophila have indicated that hybrid male sterility is the consequence of highly complex synergistic effects among multiple genes, both conspecific and heterospecific. On the contrary, much evidence suggests the presence of major genes causing hybrid female sterility and inviability in the less-related species, D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Does this contrast reflect the genetic distance between species? Or, generally, is the genetic basis of hybrid male sterility more complex than that of hybrid female sterility and inviability? To clarify this point, the D. simulans introgression of the cytological region 34D–36A to the D. melanogaster genome, which causes recessive male sterility, was dissected by recombination, deficiency, and complementation mapping. The 450-kb region between two genes, Suppressor of Hairless and snail, exhibited a strong effect on the sterility. Males are (semi-)sterile if this region of the introgression is made homozygous or hemizygous. But no genes in the region singly cause the sterility; this region has at least two genes, which in combination result in male sterility. Further, the males are less fertile when heterozygous with a larger introgression, which suggests that dominant modifiers enhance the effects of recessive genes of male sterility. Such an epistatic view, even in the less-related species, suggests that the genetic complexity is special to hybrid male sterility.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. M. Good, M. D. Dean, and M. W. Nachman
A Complex Genetic Basis to X-Linked Hybrid Male Sterility Between Two Species of House Mice
Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2213 - 2228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. L. Sweigart, L. Fishman, and J. H. Willis
A Simple Genetic Incompatibility Causes Hybrid Male Sterility in Mimulus
Genetics, April 1, 2006; 172(4): 2465 - 2479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
I. Dworkin, A. Palsson, and G. Gibson
Replication of an Egfr-Wing Shape Association in a Wild-Caught Cohort of Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 2115 - 2125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]