Influence of Dominance, Leptokurtosis and Pleiotropy of Deleterious Mutations on Quantitative Genetic Variation at Mutation-Selection Balance

Corresponding author: Xu-Sheng Zhang, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, W. Mains Rd., Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom., xu-sheng.zhang{at}ed.ac.uk (E-mail)

Communicating editor: M. A. F. NOOR

In models of maintenance of genetic variance (V_G) it has often been assumed that mutant alleles act additively. However, experimental data show that the dominance coefficient varies among mutant alleles and those of large effect tend to be recessive. On the basis of empirical knowledge of mutations, a joint-effect model of pleiotropic and real stabilizing selection that includes dominance is constructed and analyzed. It is shown that dominance can dramatically alter the prediction of equilibrium V_G. Analysis indicates that for the situations where mutations are more recessive for fitness than for a quantitative trait, as supported by the available data, the joint-effect model predicts a significantly higher V_G than does an additive model. Importantly, for what seem to be realistic distributions of mutational effects (i.e., many mutants may not affect the quantitative trait substantially but are likely to affect fitness), the observed high levels of genetic variation in the quantitative trait under strong apparent stabilizing selection can be generated. This investigation supports the hypothesis that most V_G comes from the alleles nearly neutral for fitness in heterozygotes while apparent stabilizing selection is contributed mainly by the alleles of large effect on the quantitative trait. Thus considerations of dominance coefficients of mutations lend further support to our previous conclusion that mutation-selection balance is a plausible mechanism of the maintenance of the genetic variance in natural populations.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Casellas and J. F. Medrano Within-Generation Mutation Variance for Litter Size in Inbred Mice Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2147 - 2155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X.-S. Zhang and W. G. Hill The Anomalous Effects of Biased Mutation Revisited: Mean-Optimum Deviation and Apparent Directional Selection Under Stabilizing Selection Genetics, June 1, 2008; 179(2): 1135 - 1141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Landry, C. I. Castillo-Davis, A. Ogura, J. S. Liu, and D. L. Hartl Systems-level analysis and evolution of the phototransduction network in Drosophila PNAS, February 27, 2007; 104(9): 3283 - 3288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. P. Gorlov, M. Kimmel, and C. I. Amos Strength of the purifying selection against different categories of the point mutations in the coding regions of the human genome Hum. Mol. Genet., April 1, 2006; 15(7): 1143 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. G. Shaw and S.-M. Chang Gene Action of New Mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1855 - 1865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Fernandez, A. Garcia-Dorado, and A. Caballero The Effect of Antagonistic Pleiotropy on the Estimation of the Average Coefficient of Dominance of Deleterious Mutations Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 2097 - 2112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X.-S. Zhang and W. G. Hill Predictions of Patterns of Response to Artificial Selection in Lines Derived From Natural Populations Genetics, January 1, 2005; 169(1): 411 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Fernandez, A. Garcia-Dorado, and A. Caballero Analysis of the Estimators of the Average Coefficient of Dominance of Deleterious Mutations Genetics, October 1, 2004; 168(2): 1053 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X.-S. Zhang, J. Wang, and W. G. Hill Redistribution of Gene Frequency and Changes of Genetic Variation Following a Bottleneck in Population Size Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1475 - 1492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]