The Effect of Genetic Conflict on Genomic Imprinting and Modification of Expression at a Sex-Linked Locus

Corresponding author: Hamish G. Spencer, Department of Zoology, University of Otago, 340 Great King St., P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand., h.spencer{at}otago.ac.nz (E-mail)

Communicating editor: M. A. ASMUSSEN

We examine how genomic imprinting may have evolved at an X-linked locus, using six diallelic models of selection in which one allele is imprintable and the other is not. Selection pressures are generated by genetic conflict between mothers and their offspring. The various models describe cases of maternal and paternal inactivation, in which females may be monogamous or bigamous. When inactivation is maternal, we examine the situations in which only female offspring exhibit imprinting as well as when both sexes do. We compare our results to those previously obtained for an autosomal locus and to four models in which a dominant modifier of biallelic expression is subjected to the same selection pressures. We find that, in accord with verbal predictions, maternal inactivation of growth enhancers and paternal inactivation of growth inhibitors are more likely than imprinting in the respective opposite directions, although these latter outcomes are possible for certain parameter combinations. The expected outcomes are easier to evolve than the same outcomes for autosomal loci, contradicting the available evidence concerning the direction of imprinting on mammalian sex chromosomes. In most of our models stable polymorphism of imprinting status is possible, a behavior not predicted by verbal accounts.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Van Cleve and M. W. Feldman Sex-Specific Viability, Sex Linkage and Dominance in Genomic Imprinting Genetics, June 1, 2007; 176(2): 1101 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. G. Spencer and A. G. Clark A Chip off the Old Block: A Model for the Evolution of Genomic Imprinting via Selection for Parental Similarity Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 931 - 935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. G. Spencer, T. Dorn, and T. LoFaro Population Models of Genomic Imprinting. II. Maternal and Fertility Selection Genetics, August 1, 2006; 173(4): 2391 - 2398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Mills and T. Moore Polyandry, Life-History Trade-Offs and the Evolution of Imprinting at Mendelian Loci Genetics, December 1, 2004; 168(4): 2317 - 2327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Day and R. Bonduriansky Intralocus Sexual Conflict Can Drive the Evolution of Genomic Imprinting Genetics, August 1, 2004; 167(4): 1537 - 1546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]