Genetics, Vol. 165, 2249-2258, December 2003, Copyright © 2003

Recombination Can Evolve in Large Finite Populations Given Selection on Sufficient Loci

Mark M. Ilesa, Kevin Waltersa, and Chris Canningsa
a Mathematical Modelling and Genetic Epidemiology, Division of Genomic Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2JF, United Kingdom

Corresponding author: Mark M. Iles, Division of Genomic Medicine, University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Rd., Sheffield S10 2JF, United Kingdom., m.m.iles{at}shef.ac.uk (E-mail)

Communicating editor: S. OTTO

It is well known that an allele causing increased recombination is expected to proliferate as a result of genetic drift in a finite population undergoing selection, without requiring other mechanisms. This is supported by recent simulations apparently demonstrating that, in small populations, drift is more important than epistasis in increasing recombination, with this effect disappearing in larger finite populations. However, recent experimental evidence finds a greater advantage for recombination in larger populations. These results are reconciled by demonstrating through simulation without epistasis that for m loci recombination has an appreciable selective advantage over a range of population sizes (am, bm). bm increases steadily with m while am remains fairly static. Thus, however large the finite population, if selection acts on sufficiently many loci, an allele that increases recombination is selected for. We show that as selection acts on our finite population, recombination increases the variance in expected log fitness, causing indirect selection on a recombination-modifying locus. This effect is enhanced in those populations with more loci because the variance in phenotypic fitnesses in relation to the possible range will be smaller. Thus fixation of a particular haplotype is less likely to occur, increasing the advantage of recombination.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
U. Friberg and W. R. Rice
Cut Thy Neighbor: Cyclic Birth and Death of Recombination Hotspots via Genetic Conflict
Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2229 - 2238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
K. Bullaughey, M. Przeworski, and G. Coop
No effect of recombination on the efficacy of natural selection in primates
Genome Res., April 1, 2008; 18(4): 544 - 554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. R. Haag and D. Roze
Genetic Load in Sexual and Asexual Diploids: Segregation, Dominance and Genetic Drift
Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1663 - 1678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
S. Gandon and S. P. Otto
The Evolution of Sex and Recombination in Response to Abiotic or Coevolutionary Fluctuations in Epistasis
Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1835 - 1853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. Roze and N. H. Barton
The Hill-Robertson Effect and the Evolution of Recombination
Genetics, July 1, 2006; 173(3): 1793 - 1811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
G. Martin, S. P. Otto, and T. Lenormand
Selection for Recombination in Structured Populations
Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 593 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
C. L. Althaus and S. Bonhoeffer
Stochastic Interplay between Mutation and Recombination during the Acquisition of Drug Resistance Mutations in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1
J. Virol., November 1, 2005; 79(21): 13572 - 13578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
Y. Kim and H. A. Orr
Adaptation in Sexuals vs. Asexuals: Clonal Interference and the Fisher-Muller Model
Genetics, November 1, 2005; 171(3): 1377 - 1386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
S. Bonhoeffer, C. Chappey, N. T. Parkin, J. M. Whitcomb, and C. J. Petropoulos
Evidence for Positive Epistasis in HIV-1
Science, November 26, 2004; 306(5701): 1547 - 1550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]