help button home button Genetics J Neurosci
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Konev, A. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Karpen, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Konev, A. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Karpen, G. H.
Genetics, Vol. 165, 2039-2053, December 2003, Copyright © 2003

Genetics of P-Element Transposition Into Drosophila melanogaster Centric Heterochromatin

Alexander Y. Koneva, Christopher M. Yana, David Acevedoa, Cameron Kennedya, Elaina Warda, Arlene Lima, Sanjay Tickooa, and Gary H. Karpena
a Molecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, San Diego, CA 92037

Corresponding author: Gary H. Karpen, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, 1 Cyclotron Rd., Berkeley, CA 94720., karpen{at}fruitfly.org (E-mail)

Communicating editor: K. G. GOLIC

Heterochromatin is a major component of higher eukaryotic genomes, but progress in understanding the molecular structure and composition of heterochromatin has lagged behind the production of relatively complete euchromatic genome sequences. The introduction of single-copy molecular-genetic entry points can greatly facilitate structure and sequence analysis of heterochromatic regions that are rich in repeated DNA. In this study, we report the isolation of 502 new P-element insertions into Drosophila melanogaster centric heterochromatin, generated in nine different genetic screens that relied on mosaic silencing (position-effect variegation, or PEV) of the yellow gene present in the transposon. The highest frequencies of recovery of variegating insertions were observed when centric insertions were used as the source for mobilization. We propose that the increased recovery of variegating insertions from heterochromatic starting sites may result from the physical proximity of different heterochromatic regions in germline nuclei or from the association of mobilizing elements with heterochromatin proteins. High frequencies of variegating insertions were also recovered when a potent suppressor of PEV (an extra Y chromosome) was present in both the mobilization and selection generations, presumably due to the effects of chromatin structure on P-element mobilization, insertion, and phenotypic selection. Finally, fewer variegating insertions were recovered after mobilization in females, in comparison to males, which may reflect differences in heterochromatin structure in the female and male germlines. FISH localization of a subset of the insertions confirmed that 98% of the variegating lines contain heterochromatic insertions and that these schemes produce a broader distribution of insertion sites. The results of these schemes have identified the most efficient methods for generating centric heterochromatin P insertions. In addition, the large collection of insertions produced by these screens provides molecular-genetic entry points for mapping, sequencing, and functional analysis of Drosophila heterochromatin.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. A. Hoskins, J. W. Carlson, C. Kennedy, D. Acevedo, M. Evans-Holm, E. Frise, K. H. Wan, S. Park, M. Mendez-Lago, F. Rossi, et al.
Sequence Finishing and Mapping of Drosophila melanogaster Heterochromatin
Science, June 15, 2007; 316(5831): 1625 - 1628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
F. Rossi, R. Moschetti, R. Caizzi, N. Corradini, and P. Dimitri
Cytogenetic and Molecular Characterization of Heterochromatin Gene Models in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, February 1, 2007; 175(2): 595 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
K. J. Maragathavally, J. M. Kaminski, and C. J. Coates
Chimeric Mos1 and piggyBac transposases result in site-directed integration
FASEB J, September 1, 2006; 20(11): 1880 - 1882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. A. Maggert and K. G. Golic
Highly Efficient Sex Chromosome Interchanges Produced By I-CreI Expression in Drosophila
Genetics, November 1, 2005; 171(3): 1103 - 1114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
S. R. Schulze, D. A. R. Sinclair, K. A. Fitzpatrick, and B. M. Honda
A Genetic and Molecular Characterization of Two Proximal Heterochromatic Genes on Chromosome 3 of Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 2165 - 2177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. J. Bellen, R. W. Levis, G. Liao, Y. He, J. W. Carlson, G. Tsang, M. Evans-Holm, P. R. Hiesinger, K. L. Schulze, G. M. Rubin, et al.
The BDGP Gene Disruption Project: Single Transposon Insertions Associated With 40% of Drosophila Genes
Genetics, June 1, 2004; 167(2): 761 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Genetics Society of America.