help button home button Genetics AJP: Lung
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wrischnik, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cline, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wrischnik, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cline, T. W.
Genetics, Vol. 165, 2007-2027, December 2003, Copyright © 2003

Recruitment of the Proneural Gene scute to the Drosophila Sex-Determination Pathway

Lisa A. Wrischnika, John R. Timmera, Lisa A. Megnaa, and Thomas W. Clinea
a Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3204

Corresponding author: Thomas W. Cline, University of California, 11 Koshland Hall, Mail Code 3204, Berkeley, CA 94720-3204., sxlcline{at}uclink.berkeley.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: T. C. KAUFMAN

In flies, scute (sc) works with its paralogs in the achaete-scute-complex (ASC) to direct neuronal development. However, in the family Drosophilidae, sc also acquired a role in the primary event of sex determination, X chromosome counting, by becoming an X chromosome signal element (XSE)—an evolutionary step shown here to have occurred after sc diverged from its closest paralog, achaete (ac). Two temperature-sensitive alleles, scsisB2 and scsisB3, which disrupt only sex determination, were recovered in a powerful F1 genetic selection and used to investigate how sc was recruited to the sex-determination pathway. scsisB2 revealed 3' nontranscribed regulatory sequences likely to be involved. The scsisB2 lesion abolished XSE activity when combined with mutations engineered in a sequence upstream of all XSEs. In contrast, changes in Sc protein sequence seem not to have been important for recruitment. The observation that the other new allele, scsisB3, eliminates the C-terminal half of Sc without affecting neurogenesis and that scsisB1, the most XSE-specific allele previously available, is a nonsense mutant, would seem to suggest the opposite, but we show that housefly Sc can substitute for fruit fly Sc in sex determination, despite lacking Drosophilidae-specific conserved residues in its C-terminal half. Lack of synergistic lethality among mutations in sc, twist, and dorsal argue against a proposed role for sc in mesoderm formation that had seemed potentially relevant to sex-pathway recruitment. The screen that yielded new sc alleles also generated autosomal duplications that argue against the textbook view that fruit fly sex signal evolution recruited a set of autosomal signal elements comparable to the XSEs.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
J. R. t. Bosch, J. A. Benavides, and T. W. Cline
The TAGteam DNA motif controls the timing of Drosophila pre-blastoderm transcription
Development, May 15, 2006; 133(10): 1967 - 1977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Genetics Society of America.