Selective Constraints on Intron Evolution in Drosophila

Corresponding author: John Parsch, Section of Evolutionary Biology, University of Munich (LMU), Luisenstrasse 14, Munich 80333, Germany., parsch{at}zi.biologie.uni-muenchen.de (E-mail)

Communicating editor: S. SCHAEFFER

Intron sizes show an asymmetrical distribution in a number of organisms, with a large number of "short" introns clustered around a minimal intron length and a much broader distribution of longer introns. In Drosophila melanogaster, the short intron class is centered around 61 bp. The narrow length distribution suggests that natural selection may play a role in maintaining intron size. A comparison of 15 orthologous introns among species of the D. melanogaster subgroup indicates that, in general, short introns are not under greater DNA sequence or length constraints than long introns. There is a bias toward deletions in all introns (deletion/insertion ratio is 1.66), and the vast majority of indels are of short length (<10 bp). Indels occurring on the internal branches of the phylogenetic tree are significantly longer than those occurring on the terminal branches. These results are consistent with a compensatory model of intron length evolution in which slightly deleterious short deletions are frequently fixed within species by genetic drift, and relatively rare larger insertions that restore intron length are fixed by positive selection. A comparison of paralogous introns shared among duplicated genes suggests that length constraints differ between introns within the same gene. The janusA, janusB, and ocnus genes share two short introns derived from a common ancestor. The first of these introns shows significantly fewer indels than the second intron, although the two introns show a comparable number of substitutions. This indicates that intron-specific selective constraints have been maintained following gene duplication, which preceded the divergence of the D. melanogaster species subgroup.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Hiller, S. Findeiss, S. Lein, M. Marz, C. Nickel, D. Rose, C. Schulz, R. Backofen, S. J. Prohaska, G. Reuter, et al. Conserved introns reveal novel transcripts in Drosophila melanogaster Genome Res., July 1, 2009; 19(7): 1289 - 1300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. S. Hughes, C. O. Buckley, and D. E. Neafsey Complex Selection on Intron Size in Cryptococcus neoformans Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 247 - 253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Xue, A. P. Rooney, M. Kajikawa, N. Okada, and W. L. Roelofs Novel sex pheromone desaturases in the genomes of corn borers generated through gene duplication and retroposon fusion PNAS, March 13, 2007; 104(11): 4467 - 4472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C. Presgraves Intron Length Evolution in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2006; 23(11): 2203 - 2213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Xie, C. Wu, and L. Xiong Genomic Organization, Differential Expression, and Interaction of SQUAMOSA Promoter-Binding-Like Transcription Factors and microRNA156 in Rice Plant Physiology, September 1, 2006; 142(1): 280 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Dupanloup and H. Kaessmann Evolutionary simulations to detect functional lineage-specific genes Bioinformatics, August 1, 2006; 22(15): 1815 - 1822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Halligan and P. D. Keightley Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison Genome Res., July 1, 2006; 16(7): 875 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Begun, H. A. Lindfors, M. E. Thompson, and A. K. Holloway Recently Evolved Genes Identified From Drosophila yakuba and D. erecta Accessory Gland Expressed Sequence Tags Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1675 - 1681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Akashi, W.-Y. Ko, S. Piao, A. John, P. Goel, C.-F. Lin, and A. P. Vitins Molecular Evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Subgroup: Frequent Parameter Fluctuations on the Timescale of Molecular Divergence Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1711 - 1726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Boulesteix, M. Weiss, and C. Biemont Differences in Genome Size Between Closely Related Species: The Drosophila melanogaster Species Subgroup Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2006; 23(1): 162 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Begun and H. A. Lindfors Rapid Evolution of Genomic Acp Complement in the melanogaster Subgroup of Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2005; 22(10): 2010 - 2021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Llopart, D. Lachaise, and J. A. Coyne Multilocus Analysis of Introgression Between Two Sympatric Sister Species of Drosophila: Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea Genetics, September 1, 2005; 171(1): 197 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Ometto, W. Stephan, and D. De Lorenzo Insertion/Deletion and Nucleotide Polymorphism Data Reveal Constraints in Drosophila melanogaster Introns and Intergenic Regions Genetics, March 1, 2005; 169(3): 1521 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Kern and D. J. Begun Patterns of Polymorphism and Divergence from Noncoding Sequences of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: Evidence for Nonequilibrium Processes Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2005; 22(1): 51 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Comeron Selective and Mutational Patterns Associated With Gene Expression in Humans: Influences on Synonymous Composition and Intron Presence Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1293 - 1304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]