The Problem of Counting Sites in the Estimation of the Synonymous and Nonsynonymous Substitution Rates: Implications for the Correlation Between the Synonymous Substitution Rate and Codon Usage Bias

Corresponding author: Adam Eyre-Walker, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, United Kingdom., a.c.eyre-walker{at}sussex.ac.uk (E-mail)

Communicating editor: J. HEY

Most methods for estimating the rate of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution per site define a site as a mutational opportunity: the proportion of sites that are synonymous is equal to the proportion of mutations that would be synonymous under the model of evolution being considered. Here we demonstrate that this definition of a site can give misleading results and that a physical definition of site should be used in some circumstances. We illustrate our point by reexamining the relationship between codon usage bias and the synonymous substitution rate. It has recently been shown that the rate of synonymous substitution, calculated using the Goldman-Yang method, which encapsulates the mutational-opportunity definition of a site at a high level of sophistication, is either positively correlated or uncorrelated to synonymous codon bias in Drosophila. Using other methods, which account for synonymous codon bias but define a site physically, we show that there is a negative correlation between the synonymous substitution rate and codon bias and that the lack of a negative correlation using the Goldman-Yang method is due to the way in which the number of synonymous sites is counted. We also show that there is a positive correlation between the synonymous substitution rate and third position GC content in mammals, but that the relationship is considerably weaker than that obtained using the Goldman-Yang method. We argue that the Goldman-Yang method is misleading in this context and conclude that methods that rely on a mutational-opportunity definition of a site should be used with caution.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Llopart and J. M. Comeron Recurrent Events of Positive Selection in Independent Drosophila Lineages at the Spermatogenesis Gene roughex Genetics, June 1, 2008; 179(2): 1009 - 1020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Bullaughey, M. Przeworski, and G. Coop No effect of recombination on the efficacy of natural selection in primates Genome Res., April 1, 2008; 18(4): 544 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Cutter Divergence Times in Caenorhabditis and Drosophila Inferred from Direct Estimates of the Neutral Mutation Rate Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2008; 25(4): 778 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Yang and R. Nielsen Mutation-Selection Models of Codon Substitution and Their Use to Estimate Selective Strengths on Codon Usage Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2008; 25(3): 568 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Heger and C. P. Ponting Variable Strength of Translational Selection Among 12 Drosophila Species Genetics, November 1, 2007; 177(3): 1337 - 1348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Gilchrist Combining Models of Protein Translation and Population Genetics to Predict Protein Production Rates from Codon Usage Patterns Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2007; 24(11): 2362 - 2372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Maside and B. Charlesworth Patterns of Molecular Variation and Evolution in Drosophila americana and Its Relatives Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 2293 - 2305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. K. Ingvarsson Gene Expression and Protein Length Influence Codon Usage and Rates of Sequence Evolution in Populus tremula Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2007; 24(3): 836 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Cui, P. K. Wall, J. H. Leebens-Mack, B. G. Lindsay, D. E. Soltis, J. J. Doyle, P. S. Soltis, J. E. Carlson, K. Arumuganathan, A. Barakat, et al. Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants Genome Res., June 1, 2006; 16(6): 738 - 749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. E. Popescu, T. Borza, J. P. Bielawski, and R. W. Lee Evolutionary Rates and Expression Level in Chlamydomonas Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1567 - 1576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Akashi, W.-Y. Ko, S. Piao, A. John, P. Goel, C.-F. Lin, and A. P. Vitins Molecular Evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Subgroup: Frequent Parameter Fluctuations on the Timescale of Molecular Divergence Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1711 - 1726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Stoletzki, J. Welch, J. Hermisson, and A. Eyre-Walker A Dissection of Volatility in Yeast Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2005; 22(10): 2022 - 2026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Fay and J. A. Benavides Hypervariable Noncoding Sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, August 1, 2005; 170(4): 1575 - 1587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Hirsh, H. B. Fraser, and D. P. Wall Adjusting for Selection on Synonymous Sites in Estimates of Evolutionary Distance Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2005; 22(1): 174 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. T. Webster, N. G.C. Smith, M. J. Lercher, and H. Ellegren Gene Expression, Synteny, and Local Similarity in Human Noncoding Mutation Rates Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2004; 21(10): 1820 - 1830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Lercher, J.-V. Chamary, and L. D. Hurst Genomic Regionality in Rates of Evolution Is Not Explained by Clustering of Genes of Comparable Expression Profile Genome Res., June 1, 2004; 14(6): 1002 - 1013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]