- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Sheldahl, L. A.
- Articles by Rand, D. M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Sheldahl, L. A.
- Articles by Rand, D. M.
Recombination, Dominance and Selection on Amino Acid Polymorphism in the Drosophila Genome: Contrasting Patterns on the X and Fourth Chromosomes
Lea A. Sheldahla, Daniel M. Weinreicha, and David M. Randaa Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
Corresponding author: David M. Rand, Box G-W, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912., david_rand{at}brown.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: W. STEPHAN
S = 0.0015) and on the fourth chromosome (
S = 0.0002), but the tip of the X shows a greater proportional loss of variation than the fourth shows relative to normal-recombination regions. In contrast, replacement polymorphism at the tip of the X is not reduced (
R = 0.00065, very close to the X chromosome average). MK and HKA tests both indicate a significant excess of amino acid polymorphism at the tip of the X relative to the fourth. Selection is significantly negative at the tip of the X (Nes = -1.53) and nonsignificantly positive on the fourth (Nes
2.9), analogous to the difference between mtDNA (or Arabidopsis) and the Drosophila genome average. Our distal X data are distinct from regions of normal recombination where the X shows a deficiency of amino acid polymorphism relative to the autosomes, suggesting more efficient selection against recessive deleterious replacement mutations. We suggest that the excess amino acid polymorphism on the distal X relative to the fourth chromosome is due to (1) differences in the mutation rate for selected mutations on the distal X or (2) a greater relaxation of selection from stronger linkage-related interference effects on the distal X. This relaxation of selection is presumed to be greater in magnitude than the difference in efficiency of selection between X-linked vs. autosomal selection.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Kawabe, A. Forrest, S. I. Wright, and D. Charlesworth High DNA Sequence Diversity in Pericentromeric Genes of the Plant Arabidopsis lyrata Genetics, June 1, 2008; 179(2): 985 - 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Dolgin and B. Charlesworth The Effects of Recombination Rate on the Distribution and Abundance of Transposable Elements Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 2169 - 2177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Loewe and B. Charlesworth Background Selection in Single Genes May Explain Patterns of Codon Bias Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 1381 - 1393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Shapiro, W. Huang, C. Zhang, M. J. Hubisz, J. Lu, D. A. Turissini, S. Fang, H.-Y. Wang, R. R. Hudson, R. Nielsen, et al. Adaptive genic evolution in the Drosophila genomes PNAS, February 13, 2007; 104(7): 2271 - 2276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Braverman, B. P. Lazzaro, M. Aguade, and C. H. Langley DNA Sequence Polymorphism and Divergence at the erect wing and suppressor of sable Loci of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans Genetics, July 1, 2005; 170(3): 1153 - 1165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Betancourt, Y. Kim, and H. A. Orr A Pseudohitchhiking Model of X vs. Autosomal Diversity Genetics, December 1, 2004; 168(4): 2261 - 2269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Wang, K. Thornton, J. J. Emerson, and M. Long Nucleotide Variation and Recombination Along the Fourth Chromosome in Drosophila simulans Genetics, April 1, 2004; 166(4): 1783 - 1794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

