Dominance and Overdominance of Mildly Deleterious Induced Mutations for Fitness Traits in Caenorhabditis elegans

Corresponding author: A. D. Peters, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada., peters{at}zoology.ubc.ca (E-mail)

Communicating editor: M. J. SIMMONS

We estimated the average dominance coefficient of mildly deleterious mutations (, the proportion by which mutations in the heterozygous state reduce fitness components relative to those in the homozygous state) in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. From 56 worm lines that carry mutations induced by the point mutagen ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), we selected 19 lines that are relatively high in fitness and estimated the viabilities, productivities, and relative fitnesses of heterozygotes and homozygotes compared to the ancestral wild type. There was very little effect of homozygous or heterozygous mutations on egg-to-adult viability. For productivity and relative fitness, we found that the average dominance coefficient, , was 0.1, suggesting that mildly deleterious mutations are on average partially recessive. These estimates were not significantly different from zero (complete recessivity) but were significantly different from 0.5 (additivity). In addition, there was a significant amount of variation in among lines, and analysis of average dominance coefficients of individual lines suggested that several lines showed overdominance for fitness. Further investigation of two of these lines partially confirmed this finding.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. D. Cutter, M.-A. Felix, A. Barriere, and D. Charlesworth Patterns of Nucleotide Polymorphism Distinguish Temperate and Tropical Wild Isolates of Caenorhabditis briggsae Genetics, August 1, 2006; 173(4): 2021 - 2031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. G. Shaw and S.-M. Chang Gene Action of New Mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1855 - 1865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Roux, C. Camilleri, S. Giancola, D. Brunel, and X. Reboud Epistatic Interactions Among Herbicide Resistances in Arabidopsis thaliana: The Fitness Cost of Multiresistance Genetics, November 1, 2005; 171(3): 1277 - 1288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. B. Joseph and D. W. Hall Spontaneous Mutations in Diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae: More Beneficial Than Expected Genetics, December 1, 2004; 168(4): 1817 - 1825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Fernandez, A. Garcia-Dorado, and A. Caballero Analysis of the Estimators of the Average Coefficient of Dominance of Deleterious Mutations Genetics, October 1, 2004; 168(2): 1053 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Fry How Common Are Overdominant Mutations? Genetics, June 1, 2004; 167(2): 1031 - 1032. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Fry On the Rate and Linearity of Viability Declines in Drosophila Mutation-Accumulation Experiments: Genomic Mutation Rates and Synergistic Epistasis Revisited Genetics, February 1, 2004; 166(2): 797 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X.-S. Zhang, J. Wang, and W. G. Hill Influence of Dominance, Leptokurtosis and Pleiotropy of Deleterious Mutations on Quantitative Genetic Variation at Mutation-Selection Balance Genetics, January 1, 2004; 166(1): 597 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]