- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Fukushige, T.
- Articles by McGhee, J. D.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Fukushige, T.
- Articles by McGhee, J. D.
The Evolutionary Duplication and Probable Demise of an Endodermal GATA Factor in Caenorhabditis elegans
Tetsunari Fukushigea, Barbara Goszczynskia, Helen Tiana, and James D. McGheeaa Genes and Development Research Group, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
Corresponding author: James D. McGhee, Room 2205, University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine, 3330 Hospital Dr., N.W., Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada., jmcghee{at}ucalgary.ca (E-mail)
Communicating editor: P. ANDERSON
5 kb upstream of the C. elegans elt-2 gene, which also encodes a GATA-type transcription factor; the zinc finger DNA-binding domains are highly conserved (24/25 residues) between the two proteins. The elt-2 gene is expressed only in the intestine and is essential for normal intestinal development. This article explores whether elt-4 also has a role in intestinal development. Reporter fusions to the elt-4 promoter or reporter insertions into the elt-4 coding regions show that elt-4 is indeed expressed in the intestine, beginning at the 1.5-fold stage of embryogenesis and continuing into adulthood. elt-4 reporter fusions are also expressed in nine cells of the posterior pharynx. Ectopic expression of elt-4 cDNA within the embryo does not cause detectable ectopic expression of biochemical markers of gut differentiation; furthermore, ectopic elt-4 expression neither inhibits nor enhances the ectopic marker expression caused by ectopic elt-2 expression. A deletion allele of elt-4 was isolated but no obvious phenotype could be detected, either in the gut or elsewhere; brood sizes, hatching efficiencies, and growth rates were indistinguishable from wild type. We found no evidence that elt-4 provided backup functions for elt-2. We used microarray analysis to search for genes that might be differentially expressed between L1 larvae of the elt-4 deletion strain and wild-type worms. Paired hybridizations were repeated seven times, allowing us to conclude, with some confidence, that no candidate target transcript could be identified as significantly up- or downregulated by loss of elt-4 function. In vitro binding experiments could not detect specific binding of ELT-4 protein to candidate binding sites (double-stranded oligonucleotides containing single or multiple WGATAR sequences); ELT-4 protein neither enhanced nor inhibited the strong sequence-specific binding of the ELT-2 protein. Whereas ELT-2 protein is a strong transcriptional activator in yeast, ELT-4 protein has no such activity under similar conditions, nor does it influence the transcriptional activity of coexpressed ELT-2 protein. Although an elt-2 homolog was easily identified in the genomic sequence of the related nematode C. briggsae, no elt-4 homolog could be identified. Analysis of the changes in silent third codon positions within the DNA-binding domains indicates that elt-4 arose as a duplication of elt-2, some 2555 MYA. Thus, elt-4 has survived far longer than the average duplicated gene in C. elegans, even though no obvious biological function could be detected. elt-4 provides an interesting example of a tandemly duplicated gene that may originally have been the same size as elt-2 but has gradually been whittled down to its present size of little more than a zinc finger. Although elt-4 must confer (or must have conferred) some selective advantage to C. elegans, we suggest that its ultimate evolutionary fate will be disappearance from the C. elegans genome.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Burmeister, K. Luersen, A. Heinick, A. Hussein, M. Domagalski, R. D. Walter, and E. Liebau Oxidative stress in Caenorhabditis elegans: protective effects of the Omega class glutathione transferase (GSTO-1) FASEB J, February 1, 2008; 22(2): 343 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Neves, K. English, and J. R. Priess Notch-GATA synergy promotes endoderm-specific expression of ref-1 in C. elegans Development, December 15, 2007; 134(24): 4459 - 4468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Smith, P. McGarr, and J. S. Gilleard The Caenorhabditis elegans GATA factor elt-1 is essential for differentiation and maintenance of hypodermal seam cells and for normal locomotion J. Cell Sci., December 15, 2005; 118(24): 5709 - 5719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Oskouian, J. Mendel, E. Shocron, M. A. Lee Jr., H. Fyrst, and J. D. Saba Regulation of Sphingosine-1-phosphate Lyase Gene Expression by Members of the GATA Family of Transcription Factors J. Biol. Chem., May 6, 2005; 280(18): 18403 - 18410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



