Genetics, Vol. 165, 455-456, October 2003, Copyright © 2003

Why Are Suppressors of Amber Mutations So Frequent Among Escherichia coli K12 Strains?: A Plausible Explanation for a Long-Lasting Puzzle

Dominique Belina
a Department of Pathology, University of Geneva Medical School, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland

Corresponding author: Dominique Belin, University of Geneva Medical School, “1, Michel Servet,” 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland., dominique.belin{at}medecine.unige.ch (E-mail)

AMBER mutations, which generate the chain-terminating UAG codon, have played a central role in the development of molecular biology, in particular in deciphering the relationship between DNA and proteins (BRENNER et al. 1965 Down). These mutations are conditional in the sense that their phenotype is observed only in certain bacterial strains. Amber mutations were independently isolated in several systems in the early 1960s. Seymour Benzer identified ambivalent rII mutants of bacteriophage T4 that grew on a subset of Escherichia coli K({lambda}) strains and coined the "sense vs. non-sense" terminology (BENZER and CHAMPE 1961 Down). Alan Campbell was looking for additional sites on the bacteriophage {lambda} map to study prophage integration and isolated suppressor sensitive mutations (sus) in most essential genes (CAMPBELL 1961 Down). Alan Garen identified "extreme negative" and suppressible mutants of alkaline phosphatase (GAREN and SIDDIQI 1962 Down). Finally, Richard Epstein and Charles Steinberg were attempting to isolate anti-rII mutants of T4 that would grow only on K({lambda}) strains and instead identified most of the essential genes of T4 (EPSTEIN et al. 1964 Down); the background and history of the T4 amber mutants were recently reviewed by Frank Stahl (STAHL 1995 Down).

What made the amber mutations so successful? First, amber UAG codons can be generated in almost any gene by single-base substitutions in any of eight triplets that code for seven different amino acids. Thus, even the {lambda} cro gene, encoding one of the smallest proteins with only 66 amino acid residues, contains eight codons related to UAG by a single-base substitution. Second, the suppression efficiency of most suam tRNAs can be extremely high, leading to up to 60% amino acid insertion at the amber codon. Thus, even structural proteins can be synthesized in sufficient amounts to allow normal growth; this is not the case with UAA ochre mutants, which are poorly suppressed. Finally, the isolation of temperature-sensitive tRNA suppressors of amber codons (SMITH et al. 1970 Down) expanded considerably the usefulness of these two major classes of conditional-lethal mutations.

Since UAG is a stop codon in almost 400 E. coli genes (http://www.kazusa.or.jp/codon/cgi-bin/showcodon.cgi?species=Escherichia+coli+K12+[gbbct]), one wonders why it was so easy to identify strains carrying amber-suppressor mutations. Indeed, three of nine derivatives of the original E. coli K12 strain harbor three different suam suppressors (Y10, Ymel, and CR63; BACHMANN 1987 Down). This suggests that suppression of one or more amber codon(s) not only is neutral for growth, but also may provide an unsuspected selective advantage to a bacterial strain whose growth appears completely normal, at least under standard laboratory conditions. While the purpose of early mutant isolations was mostly focused on the identification of auxotrophs, many of these early strains have been subjected to heavy mutagenesis. This probably accounts for the generation of several different suam suppressor mutations. However, the molecular basis for their fixation remained a puzzle, and a molecular scenario for their appearance has been missing for many years.

The recent characterization of the rpoS gene in 13 E. coli K12 strains provides a plausible explanation for this puzzle (ATLUNG et al. 2002 Down). Indeed, 6 of these strains carry an UAG amber codon at position 33, while most others have a CAG glutamine codon at this position. In contrast, non-K12 E. coli strains and most enterobacteriae have the GAG glutamate codon at this position of the rpoS gene. Since transitions are far more frequent than transversions, CAG pseudorevertants are expected to be more prevalent than GAG true revertants. The stability of strains carrying the rpoS amber mutation is illustrated by the fact that at least two of them, including a derivative of Hfr Cavalli, are devoid of suppressors (MILLER 1992 Down). The rpoS gene encodes a {sigma} factor required for efficient survival during the stationary phase. RpoS is, for instance, necessary for long-term survival in illuminated seawater, glycogen accumulation, and resistance to H2O2. Although rpoS mutants exhibit pleiotropic phenotypes under nonoptimal conditions, the gene is not essential in standard laboratory conditions.

It therefore seems likely that at some stage between the isolation of an E. coli strain from a convalescent diphtheria patient in 1922 and the establishment of the original K12 strain by E. L. Tatum, the bacterial strain accidentally acquired this amber mutation in rpoS. Maintenance of this strain for many years in agar stabs, as well as the heavy mutagenesis used in early experiments, probably provided the selective force for the occurrence and fixation, unnoticed at the time, of the amber suppressors. This fortuitous accident, together with the presence of the F sex factor (LEDERBERG 1984 Down) and of a {lambda}-prophage (HERSHEY and DOVE 1971 Down), certainly contributed to the amazing success of this particular bacterial strain in the development of molecular biology.


*  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author thanks Dick Epstein, Costa Georgopoulos, and Patrick Linder for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the State of Geneva and the Fonds National Suisse.


*  LITERATURE CITED
*TOP
*LITERATURE CITED

ATLUNG, T., H. V. NIELSEN, and F. G. HANSEN, 2002  Characterisation of the allelic variation in the rpoS gene in thirteen K12 and six other non-pathogenic Escherichia coli strains. Mol. Genet. Genomics 266:873-881.[Medline]

BACHMANN, B. J., 1987 Derivations and genotypes of some mutant derivatives of Escherichia coli K12, pp. 1190–1219 in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium, Vol. 2, edited by F. C. NEIDHARDT. American Society of Microbiology, Washington, DC.

BENZER, S. and S. P. CHAMPE, 1961  Ambivalent rII mutants of phage T4. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 47:1025-1038.[Free Full Text]

BRENNER, S., A. O. W. STRETTON, and D. KAPLAN, 1965  Genetic code: the "nonsense" triplets for chain termination and their suppression. Nature 206:994-998.[Medline]

CAMPBELL, A., 1961  Sensitive mutants of bacteriophage {lambda}. Virology 14:22-32.[Medline]

EPSTEIN, R. H., A. BOLLE, C. M. STEINBERG, E. KELLENBERGER, and E. BOY DE LA TOUR et al., 1964  Physiological studies on conditional lethal mutants of bacteriophage T4D. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 28:375-394.

GAREN, A. and O. SIDDIQI, 1962  Suppression of mutations in the alkaline phosphatase structural cistron of E. coli.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 48:1121-1127.[Free Full Text]

HERSHEY, A. D., and W. F. DOVE, 1971 Introduction to lambda, pp. 3–11 in The Bacteriophage Lambda, edited by A. D. HERSHEY. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

LEDERBERG, J., 1984  Gene recombination and linked segregations. Genetics 117:1-4.

MILLER, J. H., 1992 A Short Course in Bacterial Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

SMITH, J. D., L. BARNETT, S. BRENNER, and R. L. RUSSELL, 1970  More mutant tyrosine transfer ribonucleic acids. J. Mol. Biol. 54:1-14.[Medline]

STAHL, F. W., 1995  The amber mutants of phage T4. Genetics 141:439-442.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. Cesaro, R. R. D. Bettoni, C. Lascols, A. Merens, C. J. Soussy, and E. Cambau
Low selection of topoisomerase mutants from strains of Escherichia coli harbouring plasmid-borne qnr genes
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2008; 61(5): 1007 - 1015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]