- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Weisstein, A. E.
- Articles by Spencer, H. G.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Weisstein, A. E.
- Articles by Spencer, H. G.
The Evolution of Genomic Imprinting via Variance Minimization: An Evolutionary Genetic Model
Anton E. Weissteina and Hamish G. Spencerba Department of Zoology, Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
b Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Corresponding author: Hamish G. Spencer, Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand., h.spencer{at}otago.ac.nz (E-mail)
A small number of mammalian loci exhibit genomic imprinting, in which only one copy of a gene is expressed while the other is silenced. At some such loci, the maternally inherited allele is inactivated; others show paternal inactivation. Several hypotheses have been put forward to explain how this genetic system could have evolved in the face of the selective advantages of diploidy. In this study, we examine the variance-minimization hypothesis, which proposes that imprinting arose through selection for reduced variation in levels of gene expression. We present an evolutionary genetic model incorporating both this selection pressure and deleterious mutations to elucidate the conditions under which imprinting could evolve. Our analysis implies that additional mechanisms such as genetic drift are required for imprinting to evolve from an initial nonimprinting state. Other predictions of this hypothesis do not appear to fit the available data as well as predictions for two alternative hypotheses, genetic conflict and the ovarian time bomb. On the basis of this evidence, we conclude that the variance-minimization hypothesis appears less adequate to explain the evolution of genomic imprinting.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  H. G. Spencer and A. G. Clark A Chip off the Old Block: A Model for the Evolution of Genomic Imprinting via Selection for Parental Similarity Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 931 - 935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|