- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Wakeley, J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Wakeley, J.
Polymorphism and Divergence for Island-Model Species
John Wakeleyaa Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Corresponding author: John Wakeley, 16 Divinity Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138., wakeley{at}fas.harvard.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: N. TAKAHATA
of Sawyer and Hartl, are shown to be remarkably robust to population subdivision. Estimates of mutation parameters and divergence times, in contrast, are very sensitive to subdivision. These results follow from an analysis of natural selection and genetic drift in the island model of subdivision in the limit of a very large number of subpopulations, or demes. In particular, a diffusion process is shown to hold for the average allele frequency among demes in which the level of subdivision sets the timescale of drift and selection and determines the dynamic equilibrium of allele frequencies among demes. This provides a framework for inference about mutation, selection, divergence, and migration when data are available from a number of unlinked nucleotide sites. The effects of subdivision on parameter estimates depend on the distribution of samples among demes. If samples are taken singly from different demes, the only effect of subdivision is in the rescaling of mutation and divergence-time parameters. If multiple samples are taken from one or more demes, high levels of within-deme relatedness lead to low levels of intraspecies polymorphism and increase the number of fixed differences between samples from two species. If subdivision is ignored, mutation parameters are underestimated and the species divergence time is overestimated, sometimes quite drastically. Estimates of the strength of selection are much less strongly affected and always in a conservative direction.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. M. Desai and J. B. Plotkin The Polymorphism Frequency Spectrum of Finitely Many Sites Under Selection Genetics, December 1, 2008; 180(4): 2175 - 2191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Stadler, U. Arunyawat, and W. Stephan Population Genetics of Speciation in Two Closely Related Wild Tomatoes (Solanum Section Lycopersicon) Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 339 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lessard An Exact Sampling Formula for the Wright Fisher Model and a Solution to a Conjecture About the Finite-Island Model Genetics, October 1, 2007; 177(2): 1249 - 1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L. Bauer DuMont, H. A. Flores, M. H. Wright, and C. F. Aquadro Recurrent Positive Selection at Bgcn, a Key Determinant of Germ Line Differentiation, Does Not Appear to be Driven by Simple Coevolution with Its Partner Protein Bam Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 182 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Comeron Weak selection and recent mutational changes influence polymorphic synonymous mutations in humans PNAS, May 2, 2006; 103(18): 6940 - 6945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Comeron and T. B. Guthrie Intragenic Hill-Robertson Interference Influences Selection Intensity on Synonymous Mutations in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2005; 22(12): 2519 - 2530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. B. DuMont and C. F. Aquadro Multiple Signatures of Positive Selection Downstream of Notch on the X Chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, October 1, 2005; 171(2): 639 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zhu and C. D. Bustamante A Composite-Likelihood Approach for Detecting Directional Selection From DNA Sequence Data Genetics, July 1, 2005; 170(3): 1411 - 1421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Roze, F. Rousset, and Y. Michalakis Germline Bottlenecks, Biparental Inheritance and Selection on Mitochondrial Variants: A Two-Level Selection Model Genetics, July 1, 2005; 170(3): 1385 - 1399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Jensen, Y. Kim, V. B. DuMont, C. F. Aquadro, and C. D. Bustamante Distinguishing Between Selective Sweeps and Demography Using DNA Polymorphism Data Genetics, July 1, 2005; 170(3): 1401 - 1410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. F. Slade and J. Wakeley The Structured Ancestral Selection Graph and the Many-Demes Limit Genetics, February 1, 2005; 169(2): 1117 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wakeley The Limits of Theoretical Population Genetics Genetics, January 1, 2005; 169(1): 1 - 7. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wakeley Recent Trends in Population Genetics: More Data! More Math! Simple Models? J. Hered., September 1, 2004; 95(5): 397 - 405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Williamson, A. Fledel-Alon, and C. D. Bustamante Population Genetics of Polymorphism and Divergence for Diploid Selection Models With Arbitrary Dominance Genetics, September 1, 2004; 168(1): 463 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Roze and F. Rousset Joint Effects of Self-Fertilization and Population Structure on Mutation Load, Inbreeding Depression and Heterosis Genetics, June 1, 2004; 167(2): 1001 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Roze and F. Rousset Selection and Drift in Subdivided Populations: A Straightforward Method for Deriving Diffusion Approximations and Applications Involving Dominance, Selfing and Local Extinctions Genetics, December 1, 2003; 165(4): 2153 - 2166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



