Genetics, Vol. 162, 1725-1735, December 2002, Copyright © 2002

Molecular Population Genetics of Xdh and the Evolution of Base Composition in Drosophila

David J. Beguna,b and Penn Whitleya
a Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712
b Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616

Corresponding author: David J. Begun, University of California, Davis, CA 95616., djbegun{at}ucdavis.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: W. STEPHAN

Few loci have been measured for DNA polymorphism and divergence in several species. Here we report such data from the protein-coding region of xanthine dehydrogenase (Xdh) in 22 species of Drosophila. Many of our samples were from closely related species, allowing us to confidently assign substitutions to individual lineages. Surprisingly, Xdh appears to be fixing more A/T mutations than G/C mutations in most lineages, leading to evolution of higher A/T content in the recent past. We found no compelling evidence for selection on protein variation, though some aspects of the data support the notion that a significant fraction of amino acid polymorphisms are slightly deleterious. Finally, we found no convincing evidence that levels of silent heterozygosity are associated with rates of protein evolution.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
V. Nolte and C. Schlotterer
African Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans Populations Have Similar Levels of Sequence Variability, Suggesting Comparable Effective Population Sizes
Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 405 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
W.-Y. Ko, S. Piao, and H. Akashi
Strong Regional Heterogeneity in Base Composition Evolution on the Drosophila X Chromosome
Genetics, September 1, 2006; 174(1): 349 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. J. Wagstaff and D. J. Begun
Molecular Population Genetics of Accessory Gland Protein Genes and Testis-Expressed Genes in Drosophila mojavensis and D. arizonae
Genetics, November 1, 2005; 171(3): 1083 - 1101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
E. S. Balakirev, V. R. Chechetkin, V. V. Lobzin, and F. J. Ayala
Entropy and GC Content in the {beta}-esterase Gene Cluster of the Drosophila melanogaster Subgroup
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2005; 22(10): 2063 - 2072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. Bartolome, X. Maside, S. Yi, A. L. Grant, and B. Charlesworth
Patterns of Selection on Synonymous and Nonsynonymous Variants in Drosophila miranda
Genetics, March 1, 2005; 169(3): 1495 - 1507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
D. L. Halligan, A. Eyre-Walker, P. Andolfatto, and P. D. Keightley
Patterns of Evolutionary Constraints in Intronic and Intergenic DNA of Drosophila
Genome Res., February 1, 2004; 14(2): 273 - 279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
R. Piccinali, M. Aguade, and E. Hasson
Comparative Molecular Population Genetics of the Xdh Locus in the Cactophilic Sibling Species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2004; 21(1): 141 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Tarrio, F. Rodriguez-Trelles, and F. J. Ayala
A new Drosophila spliceosomal intron position is common in plants
PNAS, May 27, 2003; 100(11): 6580 - 6583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]