Genetics, Vol. 162, 1381-1388, November 2002, Copyright © 2002

The Use of Genetic Markers to Measure Genomic Response to Selection in Livestock

Luis Gomez-Rayaa, Hanne Gro Olsenb, Frode Lingaasc, Helge Klunglandb, Dag Inge Vågeb, Ingrid Olsakerc, Seblewengel Bekele Talleb, Monica Aaslandb, and Sigbjørn Lienb
a Centre UdL-IRTA, Area de Produccio Animal, 25198 Lleida, Spain,
b Department of Animal Science, Agricultural University of Norway, N-1432 Ås, Norway
c Department of Morphology, Genetics and Aquatic Biology, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, 0033 Oslo, Norway

Corresponding author: Luis Gomez-Raya, Area de Produccio Animal, Av. Alcalde Rovira Roure, 177, 25198 Lleida, Spain., luis.gomez{at}irta.es (E-mail)

Communicating editor: J. B. WALSH

A method to measure genomic response to natural and artificial selection by means of genetic markers in livestock is proposed. Genomic response through several levels of selection was measured using sequential testing for distorted segregation of alleles among selected and nonselected sons, single-sperm typing, and a test with records for growth performance. Statistical power at a significance level of 0.05 was >0.5 for a marker linked to a QTL with recombination fractions 0, 0.10, and 0.20 for detecting genomic responses for gene effects of 0.6, 0.7, and 1.0 phenotypic standard deviations, respectively. Genomic response to artificial selection in six commercial bull sire families comprising 285 half-sib sons selected for growth performance was measured using 282 genetic markers evenly distributed over the cattle genome. A genome-wide test using selected sons was significant (P < 0.001), indicating that selection induces changes in the genetic makeup of commercial cattle populations. Markers located in chromosomes 6, 10, and 16 identified regions in those chromosomes that are changing due to artificial selection as revealed by the association of records of performance with alleles at specific markers. Either natural selection or genetic drift may cause the observed genomic response for markers in chromosomes 1, 7, and 17.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. J. Sillanpaa and F. Hoti
Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci From a Single-Tail Sample of the Phenotype Distribution Including Survival Data
Genetics, December 1, 2007; 177(4): 2361 - 2377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]