Genetics, Vol. 162, 1367-1379, November 2002, Copyright © 2002

Sex-Specific Differences in Meiotic Chromosome Segregation Revealed by Dicentric Bridge Resolution in Mice

Kara E. Koehlera, Elise A. Milliea, Jonathan P. Cherrya, Paul S. Burgoyneb, Edward P. Evansc, Patricia A. Hunta, and Terry J. Hassolda
a Department of Genetics and the Center for Human Genetics, Case Western Reserve University and the University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4955,
b Division of Developmental Genetics, MRC National Institute for Medical Research, London NW7 1AA, United Kingdom
c Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom

Corresponding author: Kara E. Koehler, Case Western Reserve University and the University Hospitals of Cleveland, 10900 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106-4955., kek4{at}po.cwru.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: R. S. HAWLEY

The meiotic properties of paracentric inversion heterozygotes have been well studied in insects and plants, but not in mammalian species. In essence, a single meiotic recombination event within the inverted region results in the formation of a dicentric chromatid, which usually breaks or is stretched between the two daughter nuclei during the first meiotic anaphase. Here, we provide evidence that this is not the predominant mode of exchange resolution in female mice. In sharp contrast to previous observations in other organisms, we find that attempts to segregate the dicentric chromatid frequently result not in breakage, stretching, or loss, but instead in precocious separation of the sister centromeres of at least one homolog. This often further results in intact segregation of the dicentric into one of the meiotic products, where it can persist into the first few embryonic divisions. These novel observations point to an unusual mechanism for the processing of dicentric chromosomes in mammalian oogenesis. Furthermore, this mechanism is rare or nonexistent in mammalian spermatogenesis. Thus, our results provide additional evidence of sexual dimorphism in mammalian meiotic chromosome behavior; in "stressful" situations, meiotic sister chromatid cohesion is apparently handled differently in males than in females.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
F. Marchetti, J. Bishop, X. Lowe, and A. J. Wyrobek
Chromosomal Mosaicism in Mouse Two-Cell Embryos after Paternal Exposure to Acrylamide
Toxicol. Sci., January 1, 2009; 107(1): 194 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Fragouli, M. Lenzi, R. Ross, M. Katz-Jaffe, W.B. Schoolcraft, and D. Wells
Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis of the human blastocyst stage
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 2596 - 2608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
K. T. Jones
Meiosis in oocytes: predisposition to aneuploidy and its increased incidence with age
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2008; 14(2): 143 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
S. Kuznetsov, M. Pellegrini, K. Shuda, O. Fernandez-Capetillo, Y. Liu, B. K. Martin, S. Burkett, E. Southon, D. Pati, L. Tessarollo, et al.
RAD51C deficiency in mice results in early prophase I arrest in males and sister chromatid separation at metaphase II in females
J. Cell Biol., February 26, 2007; 176(5): 581 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Suzuki, K. Nishii, T. Okazaki, and M. Ikeno
Human Artificial Chromosomes Constructed Using the Bottom-up Strategy Are Stably Maintained in Mitosis and Efficiently Transmissible to Progeny Mice
J. Biol. Chem., September 8, 2006; 281(36): 26615 - 26623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
A. R. Isles, W. Davies, D. Burrmann, P. S. Burgoyne, and L. S. Wilkinson
Effects on fear reactivity in XO mice are due to haploinsufficiency of a non-PAR X gene: implications for emotional function in Turner's syndrome
Hum. Mol. Genet., September 1, 2004; 13(17): 1849 - 1855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. E. Koehler, E. A. Millie, J. P. Cherry, S. E. Schrump, and T. J. Hassold
Meiotic Exchange and Segregation in Female Mice Heterozygous for Paracentric Inversions
Genetics, March 1, 2004; 166(3): 1199 - 1214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Ishikawa, A. Rattigan, R. Fundele, and P. S. Burgoyne
Effects of Sex Chromosome Dosage on Placental Size in Mice
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2003; 69(2): 483 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]