- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Ptak, S. E.
- Articles by Petrov, D. A.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Ptak, S. E.
- Articles by Petrov, D. A.
How Intron Splicing Affects the Deletion and Insertion Profile in Drosophila melanogaster
Susan E. Ptaka and Dmitri A. Petrovaa Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
Corresponding author: Susan E. Ptak, Inselstr. 22, Leipzig 04103, Germany., ptak{at}eva.mpg.de (E-mail)
Communicating editor: M. A. F. NOOR
8:1 with a median size for deletions of 10 bp. These results are consistent with the deletion and insertion profiles found in most other Drosophila pseudogenes. In contrast, a recent study of D. melanogaster introns found a deletion/insertion ratio of 1.35:1, with 84% of deletions being shorter than 10 bp. This discrepancy could be explained if deletions, especially long deletions, are more frequently strongly deleterious than insertions and are eliminated disproportionately from intron sequences. To test this possibility, we use analysis and simulations to examine how deletions and insertions of different lengths affect different components of splicing and determine the distribution of deletions and insertions that preserve the original exons. We find that, consistent with our predictions, longer deletions affect splicing at a much higher rate compared to insertions and short deletions. We also explore other potential constraints in introns and show that most of these also disproportionately affect large deletions. Altogether we demonstrate that constraints in introns may explain much of the difference in the pattern of deletions and insertions observed in Drosophila introns and pseudogenes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  S. S. Hughes, C. O. Buckley, and D. E. Neafsey Complex Selection on Intron Size in Cryptococcus neoformans Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 247 - 253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
X. Hong, D. G. Scofield, and M. Lynch Intron Size, Abundance, and Distribution within Untranslated Regions of Genes Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2006; 23(12): 2392 - 2404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. C. Presgraves Intron Length Evolution in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2006; 23(11): 2203 - 2213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. L. Halligan and P. D. Keightley Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison Genome Res., July 1, 2006; 16(7): 875 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Ometto, W. Stephan, and D. De Lorenzo Insertion/Deletion and Nucleotide Polymorphism Data Reveal Constraints in Drosophila melanogaster Introns and Intergenic Regions Genetics, March 1, 2005; 169(3): 1521 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. D. Singh and D. A. Petrov Rapid Sequence Turnover at an Intergenic Locus in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2004; 21(4): 670 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Parsch Selective Constraints on Intron Evolution in Drosophila Genetics, December 1, 2003; 165(4): 1843 - 1851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|