help button home button Genetics Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wahl, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Saika-Voivod, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wahl, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Saika-Voivod, I.
Genetics, Vol. 162, 961-971, October 2002, Copyright © 2002

Evaluating the Impact of Population Bottlenecks in Experimental Evolution

Lindi M. Wahla, Philip J. Gerrishb, and Ivan Saika-Voivoda
a Applied Mathematics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada
b Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545

Corresponding author: Lindi M. Wahl, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada., lwahl{at}uwo.ca (E-mail)

Communicating editor: M. W. FELDMAN

Experimental evolution involves severe, periodic reductions in population size when fresh media are inoculated during serial transfer. These bottlenecks affect the dynamics of evolution, reducing the probability that a beneficial mutation will reach fixation. We quantify the impact of these bottlenecks on the evolutionary dynamics, for populations that grow exponentially between transfers and for populations in which growth is curbed by a resource-limited environment. We find that in both cases, mutations that survive bottlenecks are equally likely to occur, per unit time, at all times during the growth phase. We estimate the total fraction of beneficial mutations that are lost due to bottlenecks during experimental evolution protocols and derive the "optimal" dilution ratio, the ratio that maximizes the number of surviving beneficial mutations. Although more severe dilution ratios are often used in the literature, we find that a ratio of 0.1–0.2 minimizes the chances that rare beneficial mutations are lost. Finally, we provide a number of useful approximate results and illustrate our approach with applications to experimental evolution protocols in the literature.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 GeneticsHome page
J. E. Hubbarde, G. Wild, and L. M. Wahl
Fixation Probabilities When Generation Times Are Variable: The Burst Death Model
Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1703 - 1712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
J. M. Ponciano, L. De Gelder, E. M. Top, and P. Joyce
The Population Biology of Bacterial Plasmids: A Hidden Markov Model Approach
Genetics, June 1, 2007; 176(2): 957 - 968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
R. D. H. Barrett, L. K. M'Gonigle, and S. P. Otto
The Distribution of Beneficial Mutant Effects Under Strong Selection
Genetics, December 1, 2006; 174(4): 2071 - 2079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
L. De Gelder, J. M. Ponciano, Z. Abdo, P. Joyce, L. J. Forney, and E. M. Top
Combining Mathematical Models and Statistical Methods to Understand and Predict the Dynamics of Antibiotic-Sensitive Mutants in a Population of Resistant Bacteria During Experimental Evolution
Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1131 - 1144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
L. M. Wahl and C. S. DeHaan
Fixation Probability Favors Increased Fecundity Over Reduced Generation Time
Genetics, October 1, 2004; 168(2): 1009 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Genetics Society of America.