Environment Dependence of Mutational Parameters for Viability in Drosophila melanogaster

Corresponding author: James D. Fry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627-0211., jfry{at}mail.rochester.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: R. G. SHAW

The genomic rate of mildly deleterious mutations (U) figures prominently in much evolutionary and ecological theory. In Drosophila melanogaster, estimates of U have varied widely, from <0.1 to nearly 1 per zygote. The source of this variation is unknown, but could include differences in the conditions used for assaying fitness traits. We examined how assay conditions affect estimates of the rates and effects of viability-depressing mutations in two sets of lines with accumulated spontaneous mutations on the second chromosome. In each set, the among-line variance in egg-to-adult viability was significantly greater when viability was assayed using a high parental density than when it was assayed using a low density. In contrast, the proportional decline in viability due to new mutations did not differ between densities. Two other manipulations, lowering the temperature and adding ethanol to the medium, had no significant effects on either the mean decline or among-line variance. Cross-environment genetic correlations in viability were generally close to one, implying that most mutations reduced viability in all environments. Using data from the low-density, lower-bound estimates of U approached the classic, high values of Mukai and Ohnishi; at the high density, U estimates were similar to recently reported low values. The difference in estimated mutation rates, taken at face value, would imply that many mutations affected fitness at low density but not at high density, but this is shown to be incompatible with the observed high cross-environment correlations. Possible reasons for this discrepancy are discussed. Regardless of the interpretation, the results show that assay conditions can have a large effect on estimates of mutational parameters for fitness traits.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Jasnos, K. Tomala, D. Paczesniak, and R. Korona Interactions Between Stressful Environment and Gene Deletions Alleviate the Expected Average Loss of Fitness in Yeast Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 2105 - 2111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Ostrow, N. Phillips, A. Avalos, D. Blanton, A. Boggs, T. Keller, L. Levy, J. Rosenbloom, and C. F. Baer Mutational Bias for Body Size in Rhabditid Nematodes Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1653 - 1661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. F. Baer, N. Phillips, D. Ostrow, A. Avalos, D. Blanton, A. Boggs, T. Keller, L. Levy, and E. Mezerhane Cumulative Effects of Spontaneous Mutations for Fitness in Caenorhabditis: Role of Genotype, Environment and Stress Genetics, November 1, 2006; 174(3): 1387 - 1395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Avila, D. Chavarrias, E. Sanchez, A. Manrique, C. Lopez-Fanjul, and A. Garcia-Dorado Increase of the Spontaneous Mutation Rate in a Long-Term Experiment With Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, May 1, 2006; 173(1): 267 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Charlesworth, H. Borthwick, C. Bartolome, and P. Pignatelli Estimates of the Genomic Mutation Rate for Detrimental Alleles in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, June 1, 2004; 167(2): 815 - 826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Estes, P. C. Phillips, D. R. Denver, W. K. Thomas, and M. Lynch Mutation Accumulation in Populations of Varying Size: The Distribution of Mutational Effects for Fitness Correlates in Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics, March 1, 2004; 166(3): 1269 - 1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Fry On the Rate and Linearity of Viability Declines in Drosophila Mutation-Accumulation Experiments: Genomic Mutation Rates and Synergistic Epistasis Revisited Genetics, February 1, 2004; 166(2): 797 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Fry and S. V. Nuzhdin Dominance of Mutations Affecting Viability in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, April 1, 2003; 163(4): 1357 - 1364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]