Spontaneous Chromosome Loss in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Suppressed by DNA Damage Checkpoint Functions

Corresponding author: Hannah L. Klein, NYU School of Medicine, 550 First Ave., New York, NY 10016., hannah.klein{at}med.nyu.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: L. S. SYMINGTON

Genomic instability is one of the hallmarks of cancer cells and is often the causative factor in revealing recessive gene mutations that progress cells along the pathway to unregulated growth. Genomic instability can take many forms, including aneuploidy and changes in chromosome structure. Chromosome loss, loss and reduplication, and deletions are the majority events that result in loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Defective DNA replication, repair, and recombination can significantly increase the frequency of spontaneous genomic instability. Recently, DNA damage checkpoint functions that operate during the S-phase checkpoint have been shown to suppress spontaneous chromosome rearrangements in haploid yeast strains. To further study the role of DNA damage checkpoint functions in genomic stability, we have determined chromosome loss in DNA damage checkpoint-deficient yeast strains. We have found that the DNA damage checkpoints are essential for preserving the normal chromosome number and act synergistically with homologous recombination functions to ensure that chromosomes are segregated correctly to daughter cells. Failure of either of these processes increases LOH events. However, loss of the G2/M checkpoint does not result in an increase in chromosome loss, suggesting that it is the various S-phase DNA damage checkpoints that suppress chromosome loss. The mec1 checkpoint function mutant, defective in the yeast ATR homolog, results in increased recombination through a process that is distinct from that operative in wild-type cells.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Mito, J. V. Mokhnatkin, M. C. Steele, V. L. Buettner, S. S. Sommer, G. M. Manthey, and A. M. Bailis Mutagenic and Recombinagenic Responses to Defective DNA Polymerase {delta} Are Facilitated by the Rev1 Protein in pol3-t Mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 1795 - 1806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Vernon, K. Lobachev, and T. D. Petes High Rates of "Unselected" Aneuploidy and Chromosome Rearrangements in tel1 mec1 Haploid Yeast Strains Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 237 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. D. Strome, X. Wu, M. Kimmel, and S. E. Plon Heterozygous Screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Identifies Dosage-Sensitive Genes That Affect Chromosome Stability Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1193 - 1207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Shin, M. J. Chae, J. W. Song, S.-I. Jung, D. Cho, S. J. Kee, S. H. Kim, M. G. Shin, S. P. Suh, and D. W. Ryang Changes in Karyotype and Azole Susceptibility of Sequential Bloodstream Isolates from Patients with Candida glabrata Candidemia J. Clin. Microbiol., August 1, 2007; 45(8): 2385 - 2391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Navarro, L. Bi, and A. M. Bailis A Mutant Allele of the Transcription Factor IIH Helicase Gene, RAD3, Promotes Loss of Heterozygosity in Response to a DNA Replication Defect in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1391 - 1402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Abdu, M. Klovstad, V. Butin-Israeli, A. Bakhrat, and T. Schupbach An essential role for Drosophila hus1 in somatic and meiotic DNA damage responses J. Cell Sci., March 15, 2007; 120(6): 1042 - 1049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Clemenson and M.-C. Marsolier-Kergoat The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Regulates the Phosphorylation State of a Subset of DNA Checkpoint Proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2006; 26(24): 9149 - 9161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Barbera and T. D. Petes Selection and analysis of spontaneous reciprocal mitotic cross-overs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae PNAS, August 22, 2006; 103(34): 12819 - 12824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Admire, L. Shanks, N. Danzl, M. Wang, U. Weier, W. Stevens, E. Hunt, and T. Weinert Cycles of chromosome instability are associated with a fragile site and are increased by defects in DNA replication and checkpoint controls in yeast Genes & Dev., January 15, 2006; 20(2): 159 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Chauhan, T. Ciudad, A. Rodriguez-Alejandre, G. Larriba, R. Calderone, and E. Andaluz Virulence and Karyotype Analyses of rad52 Mutants of Candida albicans: Regeneration of a Truncated Chromosome of a Reintegrant Strain (rad52/RAD52) in the Host Infect. Immun., December 1, 2005; 73(12): 8069 - 8078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Myung, S. Smith, and R. D. Kolodner Mitotic checkpoint function in the formation of gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae PNAS, November 9, 2004; 101(45): 15980 - 15985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Xu, C. Boone, and H. L. Klein Mrc1 Is Required for Sister Chromatid Cohesion To Aid in Recombination Repair of Spontaneous Damage Mol. Cell. Biol., August 15, 2004; 24(16): 7082 - 7090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Smirnova, S. Van Komen, P. Sung, and H. L. Klein Effects of Tumor-associated Mutations on Rad54 Functions J. Biol. Chem., June 4, 2004; 279(23): 24081 - 24088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. K. Baetz, N. J. Krogan, A. Emili, J. Greenblatt, and P. Hieter The ctf13-30/CTF13 Genomic Haploinsufficiency Modifier Screen Identifies the Yeast Chromatin Remodeling Complex RSC, Which Is Required for the Establishment of Sister Chromatid Cohesion Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2004; 24(3): 1232 - 1244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Aylon and M. Kupiec The Checkpoint Protein Rad24 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Involved in Processing Double-Strand Break Ends and in Recombination Partner Choice Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2003; 23(18): 6585 - 6596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Ben-Aroya, A. Koren, B. Liefshitz, R. Steinlauf, and M. Kupiec ELG1, a yeast gene required for genome stability, forms a complex related to replication factor C PNAS, August 19, 2003; 100(17): 9906 - 9911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Yoshida, K. Umezu, and H. Maki Positive and Negative Roles of Homologous Recombination in the Maintenance of Genome Stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, May 1, 2003; 164(1): 31 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Schmuckli-Maurer, M. Rolfsmeier, H. Nguyen, and W.-D. Heyer Genome instability in rad54 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nucleic Acids Res., February 1, 2003; 31(3): 1013 - 1023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. Kolodner, C. D. Putnam, and K. Myung Maintenance of Genome Stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Science, July 26, 2002; 297(5581): 552 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Craven, P. W. Greenwell, M. Dominska, and T. D. Petes Regulation of Genome Stability by TEL1 and MEC1, Yeast Homologs of the Mammalian ATM and ATR Genes Genetics, June 1, 2002; 161(2): 493 - 507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]