Codon Usage Bias Covaries With Expression Breadth and the Rate of Synonymous Evolution in Humans, but This Is Not Evidence for Selection

Corresponding author: Laurence D. Hurst, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom., l.d.hurst{at}bath.ac.uk (E-mail)

Communicating editor: J. HEY

In numerous species, from bacteria to Drosophila, evidence suggests that selection acts even on synonymous codon usage: codon bias is greater in more abundantly expressed genes, the rate of synonymous evolution is lower in genes with greater codon bias, and there is consistency between genes in the same species in which codons are preferred. In contrast, in mammals, while nonequal use of alternative codons is observed, the bias is attributed to the background variance in nucleotide concentrations, reflected in the similar nucleotide composition of flanking noncoding and exonic third sites. However, a systematic examination of the covariants of codon usage controlling for background nucleotide content has yet to be performed. Here we present a new method to measure codon bias that corrects for background nucleotide content and apply this to 2396 human genes. Nearly all (99%) exhibit a higher amount of codon bias than expected by chance. The patterns associated with selectively driven codon bias are weakly recovered: Broadly expressed genes have a higher level of bias than do tissue-specific genes, the bias is higher for genes with lower rates of synonymous substitutions, and certain codons are repeatedly preferred. However, while these patterns are suggestive, the first two patterns appear to be methodological artifacts. The last pattern reflects in part biases in usage of nucleotide pairs. We conclude that we find no evidence for selection on codon usage in humans.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. K. Ingvarsson Gene Expression and Protein Length Influence Codon Usage and Rates of Sequence Evolution in Populus tremula Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2007; 24(3): 836 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Cutter, J. D. Wasmuth, and M. L. Blaxter The Evolution of Biased Codon and Amino Acid Usage in Nematode Genomes Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2006; 23(12): 2303 - 2315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Withers, L. Wernisch, and M. d. Reis Archaeology and evolution of transfer RNA genes in the Escherichia coli genome RNA, June 1, 2006; 12(6): 933 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Comeron Weak selection and recent mutational changes influence polymorphic synonymous mutations in humans PNAS, May 2, 2006; 103(18): 6940 - 6945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. C. Burns, J. Shaw, R. Campagnoli, J. Jorba, A. Vincent, J. Quay, and O. Kew Modulation of Poliovirus Replicative Fitness in HeLa Cells by Deoptimization of Synonymous Codon Usage in the Capsid Region. J. Virol., April 1, 2006; 80(7): 3259 - 3272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Semon, J. R. Lobry, and L. Duret No Evidence for Tissue-Specific Adaptation of Synonymous Codon Usage in Humans Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2006; 23(3): 523 - 529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Shabalina, A. Y. Ogurtsov, and N. A. Spiridonov A periodic pattern of mRNA secondary structure created by the genetic code. Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(8): 2428 - 2437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. d. Reis, R. Savva, and L. Wernisch Solving the riddle of codon usage preferences: a test for translational selection Nucleic Acids Res., September 24, 2004; 32(17): 5036 - 5044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Plotkin, H. Robins, and A. J. Levine Tissue-specific codon usage and the expression of human genes PNAS, August 24, 2004; 101(34): 12588 - 12591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Comeron Selective and Mutational Patterns Associated With Gene Expression in Humans: Influences on Synonymous Composition and Intron Presence Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1293 - 1304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. T. Eskesen, F. N. Eskesen, and A. Ruvinsky Natural Selection Affects Frequencies of AG and GT Dinucleotides at the 5' and 3' Ends of Exons Genetics, May 1, 2004; 167(1): 543 - 550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Borkovich, L. A. Alex, O. Yarden, M. Freitag, G. E. Turner, N. D. Read, S. Seiler, D. Bell-Pedersen, J. Paietta, N. Plesofsky, et al. Lessons from the Genome Sequence of Neurospora crassa: Tracing the Path from Genomic Blueprint to Multicellular Organism Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2004; 68(1): 1 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. O. Urrutia and L. D. Hurst The Signature of Selection Mediated by Expression on Human Genes Genome Res., October 1, 2003; 13(10): 2260 - 2264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. Makova and W.-H. Li Divergence in the Spatial Pattern of Gene Expression Between Human Duplicate Genes Genome Res., July 1, 2003; 13(7): 1638 - 1645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Rosenberg, S. Subramanian, and S. Kumar Patterns of Transitional Mutation Biases Within and Among Mammalian Genomes Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2003; 20(6): 988 - 993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Hellmann, S. Zollner, W. Enard, I. Ebersberger, B. Nickel, and S. Paabo Selection on Human Genes as Revealed by Comparisons to Chimpanzee cDNA Genome Res., May 1, 2003; 13(5): 831 - 837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Vinogradov DNA helix: the importance of being GC-rich Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2003; 31(7): 1838 - 1844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Novembre Accounting for Background Nucleotide Composition When Measuring Codon Usage Bias Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2002; 19(8): 1390 - 1394. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. J. B. Williams and L. D. Hurst Is the Synonymous Substitution Rate in Mammals Gene-Specific? Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2002; 19(8): 1395 - 1398. [Full Text] [PDF]