Female Meiosis Drives Karyotypic Evolution in Mammals

Corresponding author: Carmen Sapienza, Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, Temple University Medical School, 3307 N. Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19140., sapienza{at}unix.temple.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: S. HENIKOFF

Speciation is often accompanied by changes in chromosomal number or form even though such changes significantly reduce the fertility of hybrid intermediates. We have addressed this evolutionary paradox by expanding the principle that nonrandom segregation of chromosomes takes place whenever human or mouse females are heterozygous carriers of Robertsonian translocations, a common form of chromosome rearrangement in mammals. Our analysis of 1170 mammalian karyotypes provides strong evidence that karyotypic evolution is driven by nonrandom segregation during female meiosis. The pertinent variable in this form of meiotic drive is the presence of differing numbers of centromeres on paired homologous chromosomes. This situation is encountered in all heterozygous carriers of Robertsonian translocations. Whenever paired chromosomes have different numbers of centromeres, the inherent asymmetry of female meiosis and the polarity of the meiotic spindle dictate that the partner with the greater number of centromeres will attach preferentially to the pole that is most efficient at capturing centromeres. This mechanism explains how chromosomal variants become fixed in populations, as well as why closely related species often appear to have evolved by directional adjustment of the karyotype toward or away from a particular chromosome form. If differences in the ability of particular DNA sequences or chromosomal regions to function as centromeres are also considered, nonrandom segregation is likely to affect karyotype evolution across a very broad phylogenetic range.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. J. Metcalfe, K. V. Bulazel, G. C. Ferreri, E. Schroeder-Reiter, G. Wanner, W. Rens, C. Obergfell, M. D. B. Eldridge, and R. J. O'Neill Genomic Instability Within Centromeres of Interspecific Marsupial Hybrids Genetics, December 1, 2007; 177(4): 2507 - 2517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Goodstadt, A. Heger, C. Webber, and C. P. Ponting An analysis of the gene complement of a marsupial, Monodelphis domestica: Evolution of lineage-specific genes and giant chromosomes Genome Res., July 1, 2007; 17(7): 969 - 981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C. Presgraves and W. Stephan Pervasive Adaptive Evolution among Interactors of the Drosophila Hybrid Inviability Gene, Nup96 Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 306 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kawabe, S. Nasuda, and D. Charlesworth Duplication of Centromeric Histone H3 (HTR12) Gene in Arabidopsis halleri and A. lyrata, Plant Species With Multiple Centromeric Satellite Sequences Genetics, December 1, 2006; 174(4): 2021 - 2032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Montchamp-Moreau, D. Ogereau, N. Chaminade, A. Colard, and S. Aulard Organization of the sex-ratio Meiotic Drive Region in Drosophila simulans Genetics, November 1, 2006; 174(3): 1365 - 1371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L.-M. Chevin and F. Hospital The Hitchhiking Effect of an Autosomal Meiotic Drive Gene Genetics, July 1, 2006; 173(3): 1829 - 1832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Kalitsis, B. Griffiths, and K. H. A. Choo Mouse telocentric sequences reveal a high rate of homogenization and possible role in Robertsonian translocation PNAS, June 6, 2006; 103(23): 8786 - 8791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. T. Webster, E. Axelsson, and H. Ellegren Strong Regional Biases in Nucleotide Substitution in the Chicken Genome Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2006; 23(6): 1203 - 1216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Wu, L. Hao, Z. Han, S. Gao, K. E. Latham, F. P.-M. de Villena, and C. Sapienza Maternal Transmission Ratio Distortion at the Mouse Om Locus Results From Meiotic Drive at the Second Meiotic Division Genetics, May 1, 2005; 170(1): 327 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Underkoffler, L. E. Mitchell, Z. S. Abdulali, J. N. Collins, and R. J. Oakey Transmission Ratio Distortion in Offspring of Mouse Heterozygous Carriers of a (7.18) Robertsonian Translocation Genetics, February 1, 2005; 169(2): 843 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Fishman and J. H. Willis A Novel Meiotic Drive Locus Almost Completely Distorts Segregation in Mimulus (Monkeyflower) Hybrids Genetics, January 1, 2005; 169(1): 347 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Zhao, J. Shetty, L. Hou, A. Delcher, B. Zhu, K. Osoegawa, P. de Jong, W. C. Nierman, R. L. Strausberg, and C. M. Fraser Human, Mouse, and Rat Genome Large-Scale Rearrangements: Stability Versus Speciation Genome Res., October 1, 2004; 14(10a): 1851 - 1860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. O'Neill, M. D. B. Eldridge, and C. J. Metcalfe Centromere Dynamics and Chromosome Evolution in Marsupials J. Hered., September 1, 2004; 95(5): 375 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Meunier and L. Duret Recombination Drives the Evolution of GC-Content in the Human Genome Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2004; 21(6): 984 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Amor, K. Bentley, J. Ryan, J. Perry, L. Wong, H. Slater, and K. H. A. Choo Human centromere repositioning "in progress" PNAS, April 27, 2004; 101(17): 6542 - 6547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. E. Koehler, E. A. Millie, J. P. Cherry, P. S. Burgoyne, E. P. Evans, P. A. Hunt, and T. J. Hassold Sex-Specific Differences in Meiotic Chromosome Segregation Revealed by Dicentric Bridge Resolution in Mice Genetics, November 1, 2002; 162(3): 1367 - 1379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]