The Evolutionary Analysis of "Orphans" From the Drosophila Genome Identifies Rapidly Diverging and Incorrectly Annotated Genes

Corresponding author: Karl J. Schmid, Department of Genetics and Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Carl Zeiss Promenade 10, D-07745 Jena, Germany., schmid{at}ice.mpg.de (E-mail)

Communicating editor: M. AGUADÉ

In genome projects of eukaryotic model organisms, a large number of novel genes of unknown function and evolutionary history ("orphans") are being identified. Since many orphans have no known homologs in distant species, it is unclear whether they are restricted to certain taxa or evolve rapidly, either because of a lack of constraints or positive Darwinian selection. Here we use three criteria for the selection of putatively rapidly evolving genes from a single sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Thirteen candidate genes were chosen from the Adh region on the second chromosome and 1 from the tip of the X chromosome. We succeeded in obtaining sequence from 6 of these in the closely related species D. simulans and D. yakuba. Only 1 of the 6 genes showed a large number of amino acid replacements and in-frame insertions/deletions. A population survey of this gene suggests that its rapid evolution is due to the fixation of many neutral or nearly neutral mutations. Two other genes showed "normal" levels of divergence between species. Four genes had insertions/deletions that destroy the putative reading frame within exons, suggesting that these exons have been incorrectly annotated. The evolutionary analysis of orphan genes in closely related species is useful for the identification of both rapidly evolving and incorrectly annotated genes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Aouacheria, C. Geourjon, N. Aghajari, V. Navratil, G. Deleage, C. Lethias, and J.-Y. Exposito Insights into Early Extracellular Matrix Evolution: Spongin Short Chain Collagen-Related Proteins Are Homologous to Basement Membrane Type IV Collagens and Form a Novel Family Widely Distributed in Invertebrates Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2006; 23(12): 2288 - 2302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Siwach, S. D. Pophaly, and S. Ganesh Genomic and Evolutionary Insights into Genes Encoding Proteins with Single Amino Acid Repeats Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2006; 23(7): 1357 - 1369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Mueller, K. R. Ram, L. A. McGraw, M. C. Bloch Qazi, E. D. Siggia, A. G. Clark, C. F. Aquadro, and M. F. Wolfner Cross-Species Comparison of Drosophila Male Accessory Gland Protein Genes Genetics, September 1, 2005; 171(1): 131 - 143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Alba and J. Castresana Inverse Relationship Between Evolutionary Rate and Age of Mammalian Genes Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2005; 22(3): 598 - 606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Domazet-Loso and D. Tautz An Evolutionary Analysis of Orphan Genes in Drosophila Genome Res., October 1, 2003; 13(10): 2213 - 2219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Barrier, C. D. Bustamante, J. Yu, and M. D. Purugganan Selection on Rapidly Evolving Proteins in the Arabidopsis Genome Genetics, February 1, 2003; 163(2): 723 - 733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Betancourt and D. C. Presgraves Linkage limits the power of natural selection in Drosophila PNAS, October 15, 2002; 99(21): 13616 - 13620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Halfon and A. M. Michelson Exploring genetic regulatory networks in metazoan development: methods and models Physiol Genomics, September 3, 2002; 10(3): 131 - 143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Mounsey, P. Bauer, and I. A. Hope Evidence Suggesting That a Fifth of Annotated Caenorhabditis elegans Genes May Be Pseudogenes Genome Res., May 1, 2002; 12(5): 770 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]