- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Greene, C. N.
- Articles by Jinks-Robertson, S.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Greene, C. N.
- Articles by Jinks-Robertson, S.
Spontaneous Frameshift Mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Accumulation During DNA Replication and Removal by Proofreading and Mismatch Repair Activities
Christopher N. Greenea and Sue Jinks-Robertsona,ba Graduate Program in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322
b Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322
Corresponding author: Sue Jinks-Robertson, Department of Biology, 1510 Clifton Rd., Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322., jinks{at}biology.emory.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: M. LICHTEN
Bgl +1 frameshift allele. Wild-type and homozygous mutant diploid strains with all possible combinations of defects in the exonuclease activities of DNA polymerases
and
(conferred by the pol3-01 and pol2-4 alleles, respectively) and in mismatch repair (deletion of MSH2) were analyzed. Although there was no direct correlation between homopolymer run length and frameshift accumulation in the wild-type strain, such a correlation was evident in the triple mutant strain lacking all repair capacity. Furthermore, examination of strains defective in one or two repair activities revealed distinct biases in the removal of the corresponding frameshift intermediates by exonucleolytic proofreading and/or mismatch repair. Finally, these analyses suggest that the mismatch repair machinery may be important for generating some classes of frameshift mutations in yeast.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. N. Venkatesan, P. M. Treuting, E. D. Fuller, R. E. Goldsby, T. H. Norwood, T. A. Gooley, W. C. Ladiges, B. D. Preston, and L. A. Loeb Mutation at the Polymerase Active Site of Mouse DNA Polymerase {delta} Increases Genomic Instability and Accelerates Tumorigenesis Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2007; 27(21): 7669 - 7682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Abdulovic and S. Jinks-Robertson The in Vivo Characterization of Translesion Synthesis Across UV-Induced Lesions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Insights Into Pol{zeta}- and Pol{eta}-Dependent Frameshift Mutagenesis Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1487 - 1498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Trouiller, D. G. Schaefer, F. Charlot, and F. Nogue MSH2 is essential for the preservation of genome integrity and prevents homeologous recombination in the moss Physcomitrella patens Nucleic Acids Res., January 5, 2006; 34(1): 232 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-E. Huang, A.-G. Rio, M.-D. Galibert, and F. Galibert Pol32, a Subunit of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA Polymerase {delta}, Suppresses Genomic Deletions and Is Involved in the Mutagenic Bypass Pathway Genetics, April 1, 2002; 160(4): 1409 - 1422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


