IDT. Quality oligos. Every time.

Genetics, Vol. 158, 1535-1543, August 2001, Copyright © 2001

The nonA Gene in Drosophila Conveys Species-Specific Behavioral Characteristics

Susanna Campesana, Yuri Dubrovaa, Jeffrey C. Hallb, and Charalambos P. Kyriacoua
a Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom
b Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254

Corresponding author: Charalambos P. Kyriacou, Room 141, Adrian Bldg., Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, University Rd., Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom., cpk{at}leicester.ac.uk (E-mail)

Communicating editor: J. J. LOROS

The molecular basis of species-specific differences in courtship behavior, a critical factor in preserving species boundaries, is poorly understood. Genetic analysis of all but the most closely related species is usually impossible, given the inviability of hybrids. We have therefore applied interspecific transformation of a single candidate behavioral locus, no-on-transient A (nonA), between Drosophila virilis and D. melanogaster, to investigate whether nonA, like the period gene, might encode species-specific behavioral information. Mutations in nonA can disrupt both visual behavior and the courtship song in D. melanogaster. The lovesong of nonAdiss mutant males superficially resembles that of D. virilis, a species that diverged from D. melanogaster 40–60 mya. Transformation of the cloned D. virilis nonA gene into D. melanogaster hosts carrying a synthetic deletion of the nonA locus restored normal visual function (the phenotype most sensitive to nonA mutation). However, the courtship song of transformant males showed several features characteristic of the corresponding D. virilis signal, indicating that nonA can act as a reservoir for species-specific information. This candidate gene approach, together with interspecific transformation, can therefore provide a direct avenue to explore potential speciation genes in genetically and molecularly tractable organisms such as Drosophila.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. Sambandan, M. A. Carbone, R. R. H. Anholt, and T. F. C. Mackay
Phenotypic Plasticity and Genotype by Environment Interaction for Olfactory Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, June 1, 2008; 179(2): 1079 - 1088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. M. Gleason and M. G. Ritchie
Do Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) for a Courtship Song Difference Between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia Coincide With Candidate Genes and Intraspecific QTL?
Genetics, March 1, 2004; 166(3): 1303 - 1311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
M. J. Fitzpatrick and M. B. Sokolowski
In Search of Food: Exploring the Evolutionary Link Between cGMP-Dependent Protein Kinase (PKG) and Behaviour
Integr. Comp. Biol., February 1, 2004; 44(1): 28 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. Chan, A. Villella, P. Funes, and J. C. Hall
Courtship and Other Behaviors Affected by a Heat-Sensitive, Molecularly Novel Mutation in the cacophony Calcium-Channel Gene of Drosophila
Genetics, September 1, 2002; 162(1): 135 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]