Genetics, Vol. 158, 1167-1176, July 2001, Copyright © 2001

High-Frequency Generation of Conditional Mutations Affecting Drosophila melanogaster Development and Life Span

Gary Landisa, Deepak Bholea, Lucy Lua, and John Towera
a Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-1340

Corresponding author: John Tower, Department of Biological Sciences, SHS172, University of Southern California, University Park, 835 W. 37th St., Los Angeles, CA 90089-1340., jtower{at}USC.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: J. A. BIRCHLER

Genome sequencing reveals that a large percentage of Drosophila genes have homologs in humans, including many human disease genes. The goal of this research was to develop methods to efficiently test Drosophila genes for functions in vivo. An important challenge is the fact that many genes function at more than one point during development and during the life cycle. Conditional expression systems such as promoters regulated by tetracycline (or its derivative doxycycline) are often ideal for testing gene functions. However, generation of transgenic animals for each gene of interest is impractical. Placing the doxycycline-inducible ("tet-on") promoter directed out of the end of the P transposable element produced a mobile, doxycycline-inducible promoter element, named PdL. PdL was mobilized to 228 locations in the genome and was found to generate conditional (doxycycline-dependent), dominant mutations at high frequency. The temporal control of gene overexpression allowed generation of mutant phenotypes specific to different stages of the life cycle, including metamorphosis and aging. Mutations characterized included inserts in the {alpha}-mannosidase II (dGMII), ash1, and pumilio genes. Novel phenotypes were identified for each gene, including specific developmental defects and increased or decreased life span. The PdL system should facilitate testing of a large fraction of Drosophila genes for overexpression and misexpression phenotypes at specific developmental and life cycle stages.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Khokhar, N. Chen, J.-P. Yuan, Y. Li, G. N. Landis, G. Beaulieu, H. Kaur, and J. Tower
Conditional Switches for Extracellular Matrix Patterning in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1283 - 1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Aoki, M. Perlman, J.-M. Lim, R. Cantu, L. Wells, and M. Tiemeyer
Dynamic Developmental Elaboration of N-Linked Glycan Complexity in the Drosophila melanogaster Embryo
J. Biol. Chem., March 23, 2007; 282(12): 9127 - 9142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Paschinger, M. Hackl, M. Gutternigg, D. Kretschmer-Lubich, U. Stemmer, V. Jantsch, G. Lochnit, and I. B. H. Wilson
A Deletion in the Golgi {alpha}-Mannosidase II Gene of Caenorhabditis elegans Results in Unexpected Non-wild-type N-Glycan Structures
J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 2006; 281(38): 28265 - 28277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Leonard, D. Rendic, C. Rabouille, I. B. H. Wilson, T. Preat, and F. Altmann
The Drosophila fused lobes Gene Encodes an N-Acetylglucosaminidase Involved in N-Glycan Processing
J. Biol. Chem., February 24, 2006; 281(8): 4867 - 4875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
D. R. Marenda, C. B. Zraly, Y. Feng, S. Egan, and A. K. Dingwall
The Drosophila SNR1 (SNF5/INI1) Subunit Directs Essential Developmental Functions of the Brahma Chromatin Remodeling Complex
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2003; 23(1): 289 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text]