Inbreeding Changes the Shape of the Genetic Covariance Matrix in Drosophila melanogaster

Corresponding author: Patrick C. Phillips, Program in Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1210., pphil{at}darkwing.uoregon.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: Z-B. ZENG

The pattern of genetic covariation among traits (the G matrix) plays a central role in determining the pattern of evolutionary change from both natural selection and random genetic drift. Here we measure the effect of genetic drift on the shape of the G matrix using a large data set on the inheritance of wing characteristics in Drosophila melanogaster. Fifty-two inbred lines with a total of 4680 parent-offspring families were generated by one generation of brother-sister mating and compared to an outbred control population of 1945 families. In keeping with the theoretical expectation for a correlated set of additively determined traits, the average G matrix of the inbred lines remained proportional to the outbred control G matrix with a proportionality constant approximately equal to (1 - F), where F is the inbreeding coefficient. Further, the pattern of covariance among the means of the inbred lines induced by inbreeding was also proportional to the within-line G matrix of the control population with a constant very close to the expectation of 2F. Although the average G of the inbred lines did not show change in overall structure relative to the outbred controls, separate analysis revealed a great deal of variation among inbred lines around this expectation, including changes in the sign of genetic correlations. Since any given line can be quite different from the outbred control, it is likely that in nature unreplicated drift will lead to changes in the G matrix. Thus, the shape of G is malleable under genetic drift, and the evolutionary response of any particular population is likely to depend on the specifics of its evolutionary history.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Pigliucci Finding the Way in Phenotypic Space: The Origin and Maintenance of Constraints on Organismal Form Ann. Bot., September 1, 2007; 100(3): 433 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. K. Griswold, B. Logsdon, and R. Gomulkiewicz Neutral Evolution of Multiple Quantitative Characters: A Genealogical Approach Genetics, May 1, 2007; 176(1): 455 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Gonzalo, T. J. Vyn, J. B. Holland, and L. M. McIntyre Mapping Density Response in Maize: A Direct Approach for Testing Genotype and Treatment Interactions Genetics, May 1, 2006; 173(1): 331 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Wolf, L. J. Leamy, E. J. Routman, and J. M. Cheverud Epistatic Pleiotropy and the Genetic Architecture of Covariation Within Early and Late-Developing Skull Trait Complexes in Mice Genetics, October 1, 2005; 171(2): 683 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Estes, B. C. Ajie, M. Lynch, and P. C. Phillips Spontaneous Mutational Correlations for Life-History, Morphological and Behavioral Characters in Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics, June 1, 2005; 170(2): 645 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Mezey, D. Houle, and S. V. Nuzhdin Naturally Segregating Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting Wing Shape of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 2101 - 2113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Dworkin, A. Palsson, and G. Gibson Replication of an Egfr-Wing Shape Association in a Wild-Caught Cohort of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 2115 - 2125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Mezey and D. Houle Comparing G Matrices: Are Common Principal Components Informative? Genetics, September 1, 2003; 165(1): 411 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Beldade, K. Koops, and P. M. Brakefield Modularity, individuality, and evo-devo in butterfly wings PNAS, October 29, 2002; 99(22): 14262 - 14267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]