- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Klein, G.
- Articles by Georgopoulos, C.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Klein, G.
- Articles by Georgopoulos, C.
Identification of Important Amino Acid Residues That Modulate Binding of Escherichia coli GroEL to Its Various Cochaperones
Gracjana Kleina and Costa Georgopoulosaa Département de Biochimie Médicale, Centre Médical Universitaire, Université de Genève, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
Corresponding author: Costa Georgopoulos, Département de Biochimie Médicale, Centre Médical Universitaire, Université de Genève, 1, rue Michel Servet, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland., costa.georgopoulos{at}medecine.unige.ch (E-mail)
Communicating editor: A. L. SONENSHEIN
. The virulent bacteriophages T4 and RB49 are independent of the host GroES function, because they encode their own cochaperone proteins, Gp31 and CocO, respectively. E. coli groEL44 mutant bacteria do not form colonies above 42° nor do they propagate bacteriophages
, T4, or RB49. We found that the vast majority (40/46) of spontaneous groEL44 temperature-resistant colonies at 43° were due to the presence of an intragenic suppressor mutation. These suppressors define 21 different amino acid substitutions in GroEL, each affecting one of 13 different amino acid residues. All of these amino acid residues are located at or near the hinge, which regulates the large en bloc movements of the GroEL apical domain. All of these intragenic suppressors support bacteriophages
, T4, and RB49 growth to various extents in the presence of the groEL44 allele. Since it is known that the GroEL44 mutant protein does not interact effectively with Gp31, the suppressor mutations should enhance cochaperone binding. Analogous intragenic suppressor studies were conducted with the groEL673 temperature-sensitive allele.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Figueiredo, D. Klunker, D. Ang, D. J. Naylor, M. J. Kerner, C. Georgopoulos, F. U. Hartl, and M. Hayer-Hartl Functional Characterization of an Archaeal GroEL/GroES Chaperonin System: SIGNIFICANCE OF SUBSTRATE ENCAPSULATION J. Biol. Chem., January 9, 2004; 279(2): 1090 - 1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Kondrashov, S. Sunyaev, and F. A. Kondrashov Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities in protein evolution PNAS, November 12, 2002; 99(23): 14878 - 14883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

