Genetics, Vol. 158, 357-367, May 2001, Copyright © 2001

Statistical Modeling of Interlocus Interactions in a Complex Disease: Rejection of the Multiplicative Model of Epistasis in Type 1 Diabetes

Heather J. Cordella, John A. Todda, Natasha J. Hilla, Christopher J. Lorda, Paul A. Lyonsa, Laurence B. Petersonb, Linda S. Wickerb, and David G. Claytona
a Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Wellcome Trust Centre for Molecular Mechanisms in Disease, Cambridge, CB2 2XY, United Kingdom
b Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey 07065

Corresponding author: Heather J. Cordell, Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Wellcome Trust Centre for Molecular Mechanisms in Disease, Wellcome Trust/MRC Bldg., Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Rd., Cambridge CB2 2XY, United Kingdom., heather.cordell{at}cimr.cam.ac.uk (E-mail)

Communicating editor: Z-B. ZENG

In general, common diseases do not follow a Mendelian inheritance pattern. To identify disease mechanisms and etiology, their genetic dissection may be assisted by evaluation of linkage in mouse models of human disease. Statistical modeling of multiple-locus linkage data from the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse model of type 1 diabetes has previously provided evidence for epistasis between alleles of several Idd (insulin-dependent diabetes) loci. The construction of NOD congenic strains containing selected segments of the diabetes-resistant strain genome allows analysis of the joint effects of alleles of different loci in isolation, without the complication of other segregating Idd loci. In this article, we analyze data from congenic strains carrying two chromosome intervals (a double congenic strain) for two pairs of loci: Idd3 and Idd10 and Idd3 and Idd5. The joint action of both pairs is consistent with models of additivity on either the log odds of the penetrance, or the liability scale, rather than with the previously proposed multiplicative model of epistasis. For Idd3 and Idd5 we would also not reject a model of additivity on the penetrance scale, which might indicate a disease model mediated by more than one pathway leading to ß-cell destruction and development of diabetes. However, there has been confusion between different definitions of interaction or epistasis as used in the biological, statistical, epidemiological, and quantitative and human genetics fields. The degree to which statistical analyses can elucidate underlying biologic mechanisms may be limited and may require prior knowledge of the underlying etiology.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Irie, B. Reck, Y. Wu, L. S. Wicker, S. Howlett, D. Rainbow, E. Feingold, and W. M. Ridgway
Genome-Wide Microarray Expression Analysis of CD4+ T Cells from Nonobese Diabetic Congenic Mice Identifies Cd55 (Daf1) and Acadl as Candidate Genes for Type 1 Diabetes
J. Immunol., January 15, 2008; 180(2): 1071 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. Hunter, D. Rainbow, V. Plagnol, J. A. Todd, L. B. Peterson, and L. S. Wicker
Interactions between Idd5.1/Ctla4 and Other Type 1 Diabetes Genes
J. Immunol., December 15, 2007; 179(12): 8341 - 8349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
S Waller, M Tremelling, F Bredin, L Godfrey, J Howson, and M Parkes
Evidence for association of OCTN genes and IBD5 with ulcerative colitis
Gut, June 1, 2006; 55(6): 809 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
C. Motzo, D. Contu, H. J. Cordell, R. Lampis, M. Congia, M. G. Marrosu, J. A. Todd, M. Devoto, and F. Cucca
Heterogeneity in the Magnitude of the Insulin Gene Effect on HLA Risk in Type 1 Diabetes
Diabetes, December 1, 2004; 53(12): 3286 - 3291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
D. Smyth, J. D. Cooper, J. E. Collins, J. M. Heward, J. A. Franklyn, J. M.M. Howson, A. Vella, S. Nutland, H. E. Rance, L. Maier, et al.
Replication of an Association Between the Lymphoid Tyrosine Phosphatase Locus (LYP/PTPN22) With Type 1 Diabetes, and Evidence for Its Role as a General Autoimmunity Locus
Diabetes, November 1, 2004; 53(11): 3020 - 3023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. Wang and H. Zhao
Sample Size Needed to Detect Gene-Gene Interactions using Association Designs
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2003; 158(9): 899 - 914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
H. J. Cordell
Epistasis: what it means, what it doesn't mean, and statistical methods to detect it in humans
Hum. Mol. Genet., October 1, 2002; 11(20): 2463 - 2468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
A. A. Bachmanov, D. R. Reed, X. Li, S. Li, G. K. Beauchamp, and M. G. Tordoff
Voluntary Ethanol Consumption by Mice: Genome-Wide Analysis of Quantitative Trait Loci and Their Interactions in a C57BL/6ByJ x 129P3/J F2 Intercross
Genome Res., August 1, 2002; 12(8): 1257 - 1268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Bagot, S. Campino, C. Penha-Goncalves, S. Pied, P.-A. Cazenave, and D. Holmberg
Identification of two cerebral malaria resistance loci using an inbred wild-derived mouse strain
PNAS, July 23, 2002; 99(15): 9919 - 9923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]